CivArchive
    Flux Lustly.ai Uncensored v1: nsfw Lora with male and female nudity - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 35810830
    Preview 38684762
    Preview 38684109
    Preview 38603545
    Preview 38597453
    Preview 38604297
    Preview 36345246
    Preview 38602070
    Preview 35813294
    Preview 35814002
    Preview 35815792
    Preview 35816775
    Preview 35818360
    Preview 35820330
    Preview 38598401
    Preview 35821265
    Preview 35824578
    Preview 35823857
    Preview 35824492
    Preview 35833806

    Lustly is now periwinkl.ai

    Check out our completely new, amazing model based on Z-Image. Check out the examples: https://civarchive.com/user/periwinkl/images

    ======= ARCHIVED INFO BELOW =======

    We are thrilled to be introducing our first uncensored Flux model:

    Flux Lustly.ai Uncensored v1: Full Frontal Nudity!

    You've seen female nudity in Flux; now, we're evening the playing field by introducing male nudity as well.

    • Performance:

      • Reliable on Flux dev

      • Promising on schnell model, though slightly less stable. High-quality results are still very achievable.

    • Testing:

      • We tested on full dev and schnell models using diffusers.

      • On-site CivitAi generator seems to work fine (https://civarchive.com/images/35833806)

      • Community Call: We haven't tested in other environments like Forge or ComfyUI, nor on quantized models. Let us know if you achieve good results!

    For more details on diffusers inference see https://huggingface.co/lustlyai/Flux_Lustly.ai_Uncensored_nsfw_v1

    Roadmap

    Looking ahead, we're excited to develop further iterations of our open-source base model, expanding into:

    • More diverse poses

    • More, ehm, dynamic interactions between individuals

    • All sorts of kinks

    Join the Movement

    Try this model out at Lustly.ai

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (10)

    barlogspam176Oct 22, 2024
    CivitAI

    So this can drawn naked bodies well, but still does not uderstand sexual positions? Right?

    lustlyaiOct 22, 2024· 3 reactions

    Yup, this iteration is focused on basic frontal nudity with no sexual interaction. Stay tuned for further updates as we add more capabilities to the model

    barlogspam176Oct 22, 2024· 1 reaction

    @lustlyai Nice. You are probably aware of this, but

    https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1fuukwz/fluxdevdedistill_an_undistilled_version_of_flux/

    Apparently with an undistileed version of FLux fine tuning works better. The guy is quite faat at asnwering, if you have any questions.

    lustlyaiOct 22, 2024

    @barlogspam176 yeah, this was attempted before as well https://huggingface.co/ashen0209/Flux-Dev2Pro

    barlogspam176Oct 22, 2024

    @lustlyai Ah damn. So apparently the results is not that impressive.

    Have you tried funtuning one of the two? Are the results better or worse?

    I have noidea how much it costs you to finetune it, so maybe my question is too arrogant.

    TheGreatOne321Oct 22, 2024

    @barlogspam176 training with de-distilled and Dev2Pro tends to produce better results (see my de-distilled finetune for an example). That being said, if using de-distilled specifically you'll need to use CFG at inference to get good results, meaning that you'll have to use a de-distilled checkpoint which seems to have spotty compatibility with distilled resources.

    lustlyaiOct 22, 2024

    @barlogspam176 quality sucks when applied to distilled models. The community is still figuring out how to work with flux, for now there's no silver bullet

    barlogspam176Oct 22, 2024

    @lustlyai damn

    MendakarNov 4, 2024
    CivitAI

    Wonderful!!! Fantastic results 😊

    GentileschiNov 7, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    You should try to create a flux checkpoint like this lora.