This model is recommended for use with Comfyui
compatibility with Reforge is not guaranteed.
RECOMMEND setting (NTR MIX Xiii)
{your Prompt}
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest,
you can add tag scenery, (volumetric lighting), To make the background more distinctive.Use dpm ++ 2m sgm uniform or karras (Sometimes euler is okay...?)
Step 25, cfg 5 (can up to 5.8 by looking at the situation)
If you not use LoRA, author tags, etc., up the step to 28 EXTREAM (very scenery) setting (NTR MIX Xii)
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, (scenery, volumetric lighting),
{your Prompt}
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, (scenery, volumetric lighting)Use dpm ++ 2m karras or sgm uniform
Step 28, cfg 5.8 (can take it down to 5 by looking at the situation)SOFT (char only, simple background) setting (NTR MIX Xii)
Quality tags (please put Bottom of the tag)
{your Prompt}
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest,Use dpm ++ 2m beta or karras or sgm uniform
Step 20, cfg 5 (up to 5.8 by looking at the situation)EXTREAM (very scenery) setting (NTR MIX Xi)
Use dpm ++ 2m SDE (recommend SGM UNIFORM or Karras or BETA, choose your own!)
Step 28, cfg 5.8 (can take it down to 5.5 by looking at the situation)this need Two Quality tags, bottom and top (refers to the beginning and end of the prompt.)
Quality tags (please put Bottom and Top of the tag)
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, (scenery, volumetric lighting),
{your Prompt}
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, (scenery, volumetric lighting)SOFT (char only, simple background) setting (NTR MIX Xi)
Use dpm ++ 2m karras
Step 28, cfg 5.8 (can take it down to 5 by looking at the situation)Quality tags (please put Bottom of the tag)
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, volumetric lighting
{your Prompt}
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, volumetric lightingNegative Tags (all setting)
lowres, (worst quality, bad quality:1.2), bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background, Recommendation setting (under NTR MIX 777)
Use dpm ++ 2m Karras (in i2i, use BETA and cfg 5)
Step 28, cfg 7Quality tags (please put Bottom of the tag)
masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, Negative tags
lowres, (worst quality, bad quality:1.2), bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background, conjoined, futanari, Description
if you want use LoRA, use this one instead of 777
FAQ
Comments (63)
wow super
Civitai, pls, make the on site generation possible, we really want it!
I've been requesting that as well but Civitai admins won't listen
Whats the difference 777 (for lora) or without it? one is more lora friendly?
Seems like the lora version doesn't have as much of a default artstyle baked in, meaning it shouldn't interfere as much with features characteristic for whatever style you're trying to apply. In a way it's closer to the new NoobAI Epsilon-pred 1.1
What exactly is the difference between v777 for and not for lora, what makes v777 (presumably) not suitable for LoRAs?
Is there a downside to using v777 for lora version?
And does "NTRMIX 1.0 + noob 1.1" mean that you did not merge v4.0 to create v777?
(sorry for all these questions 😅 I don't quite understand it so i'm asking for some clarification)
Yeah, 777 doesn't support LoRA, because it's built-in. 777 for LoRA doesn't have that problem because it only merges checkpoints, so you can put in quality prompts, quality LoRA, a lot of things.Simply put, for LoRA if you want to customize it, and 777 if you want to use it natively.
@tkio Thank you for the answer, I understand now 👍
i just started to using illus models and urs is the first. saw 777 one going out, imma check !
Could you add update logs ?
V4 didn't need as much of a prefix or suffix, whereas v777 requires at least a quality prefix for good output.
This model is pretty amazing but I have two questions: Is there a default look/style to the model? As the same with v4.0, the default style seems to overpower the artist styles that I tag at times.
Second, am I supposed to be using this with ComfyUI or Reforge? I've been using it with A1111.
can you make a version without giant heads pls
This model is amazing! is there any list where I can check which characters are trained in it from which anime?
Why not just try it one by one? You can use https://github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete to get the hints
The images I generate are always overexposed, even when creating night scenes, they appear as bright as daytime. I've tried lowering the CFG, but it hasn't improved. Can someone help me out?
You might want to use this: https://civitai.com/models/653604/darker-than-dark
@anon5522 Doesn't work, but thank you anyway :(
I had the same problem and the change of negative prompt helped me:
lowres, (worst quality, bad quality:1.2), bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background,
One of the best models on this site, but what were you smoking while deciding the version numbers? Can you drop an explainer for them?
The BEST checkpoint I've ever used!! 😍
EDIT: It always gives me a loli figure, help...
I agree. It got me hooked on AI generation again.
Am I the only one who has the feeling that v4 is better than v777 ?
I assume this is due to merging in NoobAI EPS v1.1, the base style looks very much like it but more stable from what i've experienced
the versions were also rearranged to show v4 at the front again and v777 behind v2.1#
It's a bit harder to handle, requiring you get more familiar with NoobAI prompting, but if done correctly the ouput is indeed more stable and impressive than the previous version.
@vemn What's the differences between NoobAI and Illustrious prompting? I've been looking at some of the prompt from NoobAI epsilon and I don't see anything that stands out.
@stableskynet171 from my own experience there doesn't seem to be a major difference between illustrious and noobai prompting, its more pony vs noob/illu since with pony, simple prompts can give a good image but with a lot of noob/illu models simple prompts won't yield good results, but thats HIGHLY dependent on the model you use. base noob/illu are not very usable for a noob to get good images out of since they are not trained on aesthetics at all. there are models where it works tho.
Also NoobAI based models support simple natural language prompting, you can combine tags and sentences.
@stableskynet171 one of the biggest difference that I saw reading, according to a guide, illustrious can work better with more detailed natural prompting, and noobai apparently goes more to tags of booru tags and staff like that
@P_Universe other way around, iirc according to the paper onoma released, illustrious v0.1 is not trained on natural language at all. Only their unreleased 1.1 and 2.0 models are trained with natural language.
NoobAI is the model that is trained on natural language and native tags, as the model description CivitAI says
@DraconicDragon loool what, I just read this guide https://civitai.com/articles/8380/tips-for-illustrious-xl-prompting-updates
Claiming that, anyway,I guess I must try again noobai, although I don't remember natural language on its examples tho, anyway, do you know if it still 75 tokens or you can go further?
@P_Universe
TLDR: illu v0.1 is not trained on NLP, but it can change images. NoobAI is trained on NLP and will actually understand the sentences better. using natural language on any of the two models should be a good thing
Ok i think i see the misunderstanding now, the article says it works with NLP, which all SDXL models do, including Pony actually, but both illustrious and pony don't understand natural language as well since they aren't trained on it. The article shows a section from the illustrious paper which shows the effect of NLP and long prompts but it explicitly mentions that illustrious v0.1 is NOT trained on NLP, the section shown is just showing the effect of what happens when you do use it.
(see "3.1.4 Limited Corpus" in the paper your article mentions > "Furthermore, the v0.1 model has difficulty processing natural language-based prompts, especially longer ones, as it was not well adapted to such formats."
And Table 5 under section "4 Training Setups" )
NoobAI on the other hand is trained on native danbooru and e621 tags as well as natural language captioning (at least they state so in the model description on civitai), it should actually understand simple sentences rather than simply making more sophisticated images (which isnt bad, its good but illustrious won't understand NLP as well as noob)
Regarding the 75 token limit, any sdxl model can go beyond 75 tokens, comfyui/forge/a1111 just split the prompt into 75 token chunks if its longer than 75 tokens so subsequent chunks just have less weight than the first one (they aren't considered as much)
There is also LongCLIP which allows for 248 tokens in a chunk i think but i don't think theres any sdxl model using it
@DraconicDragon first thank you so much to take the time to write all this, it's very helpful, and now I understand but I have a question, you see noobai V-Pred-0.65S-Version seems to be totally different to epsilon pred 1.1 as they seems to have different "guides" to use, Wich one you say is the one that will understand better with natural prompts with some tags?
@P_Universe Purely thinking of "understanding" of the prompts I'd say they are the same. The V-Pred enhances colors, composition and coherency, it might give you more desirable results than Eps pred.
Great article explaining vpred and the "issues" with epsilon pred: https://rentry.org/wtfvpred
I personally am holding off on using noob ai vpred since i want to see the finished version, the main issue i personally have is that its too hard to get good results out of either base model with simple prompting, be it illustrious v0.1 or any of the newer noobai (eps/vpred) versions. They just aren't trained for aesthetics (but both, mainly noobai, have a lot of knowledge making it for me more appealing than any Pony based or illustrious (base) models. I recommend using some style finetune/merge of noobai like this one - NTRmix - or any others that fit your preferences. (theres also hikari noob vpred which seems to be giving a more stable base style)
@DraconicDragon okay then, thank you so much, this will help me a lot
v777, or at least the lora version, seems unusable. v4 is great if only style loras could be applied in an effective way to change the default proportions and such.
What's the difference between V4 and V777?
It's closer to the new Epsilon 1.1 version of NoobAI.
V777 is a bit better than V4 if you know how to properly prompt and manipulate the model, has a bigger range of things you can do with it too, but V4 is waaay easier and more consistent than V777 and i would recommend that towards people that are newer to illustrious type models
1
The best model with composition ranges, but it is really hard to tame with inpainting. I resort to using a different model for refining the image.
agree, hard to do img2img, literally the best in composition
Love this checkpoint! Really good with color, wild, just how I like it!
Perfect checkpoint! And I want to know what model this checkpoint (v777) is mainly based on? If I were to use lora, which one would give the best results, Illustrious lora or Noob lora?
The main is noob. But, I don't know the difference between LoRA trained with any model, either one works just fine.
i like to train NoobAI 0.5 eps regardless of what happen down the line.
it ensure max compatibility over most of the merge.
for instance my own LORA works wonder with their respective details. i updated them all. i use Konpa Evo Mix tho...
Can I train character/style lora with this? If yes which model version should I even use? There's so many lol
Perfect Perfect Perfect
This 777for lora of ntrmix can use lora from pony
Awesome
not sure why but my gens on 777 look way worse then the ones on 4 and while my gen 4 pics look on par with the examples in this page, my 777 gens do not at all
same for me!
Gotta agree with some people, I think v4.0 is better than 777,its more easier to get image with pretty good shading/prettier color with the basic "masterpiece, best quality, etc" Template prompts without much tinkering
can you give prompt for that comic fight concept?
-> masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, 1boy, hatsune miku, (ronald mcdonald), muscular male, , rabbit hole (vocaloid), action, battle, motion lines, comic, text, speech bubble,manga, blood on face, punching , dutch angle, dynamic pose, , masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, volumetric lighting
You may need to get an additional addon
@Fatbuns thanks. What addon?
will we ever get on-site gen with this
This usually isn't up to the model creators, unfortunately. Civitai makes those decisions.
I've been getting generations of flat off-white. Do I require a VAE? This is my first time using Illustrious. I'm using the 4.0 model.
Edit: I've been able to generate content, but its of a much lower quality than the examples. Any recommendations?
The 777 version looks a bit more realistic. It doesn't produce completely anime-focused results. But it's a bit harder to get good results. The V4 version is more artistic and can easily produce good results. I still prefer V4 for convenience.
Details
Files
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.


