The first iteration of multileg. It is hard to work with and you have to push it really hard to get a workable initial txt2img, then fix the results with img2img. I'll be updating this when I figure out some better parameters that maintain flexibility while generating better multilegs (models seem to be very multi-leg averse). I originally intended this model to do both 3 legs and 4 legs, but it isn't able to distinguish well between the two so I might split them in the future. I've been working on this one for a while and figured maybe some people could have some fun while I work on improving it 😉.
For initial generation at 512x768ish, a weight of 1-1.5 works, combined with ((multileg, mtlg, 3leg, multiple legs, extra legs):1.4). You will probably get somewhat distorted images. Next double the resolution (1024x1536ish) for img2img, and turn the weight down to 0.5ish, and possibly the other parameter weights to 1.2 or lower as well.
Description
FAQ
Comments (13)
Now you can make the ai fuck up on purpose
"If you can't win, join them." lmao 😂
Imagine...
Ever tried this in the Neg prompt field?
I 100% assumed that this was meant to be a Negative, especially since it came in along with elongated torsos, elongated necks, multiple heads, etc... I thought it was brilliant. Maybe it doesn't work as a neg? It would be the first time I ever saw a Lora used as a Negative.
@Jellai you can use it as a neg by using a neg value on the slider. i find using Neg values in loras very effective!!
I think it would be best to split it into 3 and 4 leg versions. There's differences in how 3 and 4 leg hips and butts look and the model seems to fight hard to make the hips and butt consistent with 2 legs.
Any chance that you're working on a multibreast model? I'd love to see your take on a triple breast model since your models are so good!
I think you're right. I was pretty excited to re-run this with 5x the training data but didn't get much better results :(. I'm gonna try again with split 3 and 4. Hopefully it's that and not a problem with the models or params I don't understand.
I really like the multibreast model I've been using from civit, but you're not the first to ask. Maybe I will check out tribreast and see how well it works...
@_NSFW_ Good luck, I hope splitting them works out! As a multileg lover (and as someone who seems to share all the same fetishes as you) I'm looking forward to it!
@_NSFW_ I'm guessing splitting between 3 and 4 didn't have the results you wanted?
Maybe it's good. I love models like this. But it seems to need to improve this. It doesn't work well with some famous checkpoints at least in my view. Hope you could continue to develop this model. I really love it! Look forward to your updates.