This is Melisande The Priestess Character of Fantasy RPG Games.
Description
FAQ
Comments (19)
Why do you put your characters in the "style" category? They are not style LoRAs
Because they are characters of my invention, they are not characters from a recognized game, this is my game, so I choose the dress as a point of reference, therefore ''style''…
@Murex90707 "character" is for any character, it's not only for characters from games. It's for loras to create any consistent character. "styles" is for artistic styles, to make any character or image in a specific style, therefore you're incorrect and people who are looking for characters will never find yours because you're placing them in the incorrect category
And if your lora is only the clothing, there is a category for "clothing". Style is the wrong category no matter how you look at it
@victorc25744 Given that what you say is right (in any case if it is a mere question of ''research'' they still come out because there is the ''characters'' tag), taking the CA training styles as a reference, '' characters''= specific person or character, ''style''= time period, art style, GENERAL LOOK, or feel, ''concept''= object, CLOTHING, anatomy etc, I don't see them as ''character'' for the previously mentioned reason, I don't see them as ''concept'' because the dress is almost identical there are no variations, therefore it is not ''clothing'', I see this series of models as ''general look'', therefore how she look and the dress is part of how she looks.
@Murex90707 style is a style, like an artist's style. This is not an artist style, you cannot use it to produce a landscape in a specific style, so it does not match the "style" category
@victorc25744 Do you know what ''general look'' means?, I'll give you an example: ''the general look of her dress is stunning'', it means how the dress fits on her so it has everything to do with it, what does a ''landscape' have to do with it ''?!?, as I said in the previous message in the CA training under ''Style'' there is also ''general look'', the general look has nothing to do with landscapes, the categories under the heading ''Style'' are: ''time period,'' ''Art Style''(the one you are talking about), ''General Look'', and ''Feel'', if you don't believe me click on '' Train LoRa'', and you can see for yourself.
@Murex90707 you're confusing "clothing style" with "artistic style". The "style" category in the site is for artistic style, not for looks
@Murex90707 look, you can keep publishing your characters in the wrong category, I just liked them but though it was sad people won't be able to find them because they are in the wrong category. Do whatever you want, I don't care
@victorc25744 I thank you for the appreciation and for the suggestion regarding the fact that in your opinion users don't ''find'' my models, for the topic itself we are talking about two different things, as I said before what you say about '' character'' is right, what I'm trying to explain to you is why I put them in the ''style'', a model based on ''clothing'' has different types of clothes otherwise it wouldn't be a model if the ''dress'' (main topic of the model), if only one. The example I gave before ''general look of he dress is stunning'', was to make you understand the vision I had when I started the series and continued like this, I wanted to make that unique type of ''outfit'' (in this case perhaps it is the most suitable word given that it is unique and there are no variations), the subject of the model (rather than the character), which however cannot be included in the ''clothing'' category because that refers to multiple outfit ''styles'' instead of just one. Then the fact that someone searches for ''character'' in the bar and doesn't find mine, I more than agree, I said it before, but I publish based on my ''vision'' not on how they might or might not see it the others, if I published what I think others might like, or I published about how they want to ''find'' things, I wouldn't publish anything anymore. However, after all this papyrus, thanks again for the appreciation.
@Murex90707 wow. seriously i wouldn´t had te patience to explain that is your chanel...and you do what you want with it. categories are not part of the fking tos. i salute you for have the patience Murex seriosly. i read this and thought. wtf is this victorc guy problem
@Styx_In_Clouds Thanks for what you said, the ''style'' was the role of the character not the ''character'' itself, but he doesn't undestand, i try to explain but nothing. 😒
@Murex90707 just wasting time to explain morons things...don´t do that. just take comments like 🤓 actually its character not style or actually it should be red not blue 🤓 as it actually is. jelousy. you know you make good loras and people like that know it too thats why they write negative comments in reviews
@Styx_In_Clouds Yeah, sometimes is better. 😒
@Styx_In_Clouds it only took you a year to find this LoRA, clearly proving my point. Thanks.
@victorc25744 look at sherlock over here. just a little thing "there are well over a million models on this site" with this much tools to choose from sometime models go under. sit the f down
@Styx_In_Clouds you're the one necromancing a year old comment like a clown. Don't ping me anymore and go bother someone else kid
@victorc25744 hahahahahaahahahahahahahahahah you pinged me first hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahhahahahahahaha
@Styx_In_Clouds this is my comment, you're pinging me every time...
Looks like we don't have an active mirror for this file right now.
CivArchive is a community-maintained index — we catalog mirrors that volunteers upload to HuggingFace, torrents, and other public hosts. Looks like no one has uploaded a copy of this file yet.
Some files do get recovered over time through contributions. If you're looking for this one, feel free to ask in Discord, or help preserve it if you have a copy.
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.