Works Perfectly With Most NSFW LoRas
speaking of which.. Checkout my NEW LoRa for old webcam style photography (18+):
https://civarchive.com/models/267954/nostalgicam-18-nude-webcam-girls
Very Real (;
Lazy Mix Plus is a way more NSFW-extensive variation of my photorealistic merge, LazyMix. It has some extra ingredients added to the merge, most significantly, the amazing SubReddit V3 model. Please refer to the model page for trigger words, although they are not necessary to get the model's benefits, they are still optional and can be used.
This model NO LONGER includes DreamLike PhotoReal v2 as of LazyPlus v4.
Note: For optimal results, it's recommended to use this model with a VAE. While it can still function without one, incorporating a VAE will significantly enhance its performance.
VAE IS NOW BAKED IN UNLESS YOU DOWNLOAD THE NV PICKLE FILE
Read: Due to this seed breaking change [ 2023-02-19 - deterministic DPM++ SDE across different batch sizes],
The example images cannot be reproduced unless you toggle the: Do not make DPM++ SDE deterministic across different batch sizes setting, found in the Compatibility tab of A1111's settings.
Description
uses an updated version of the LazyBase which includes Realistic Vision 3.0
Merges with the same models merged in v2.1 which includes overall improvements
Updated to Subreddit V6 (Trigger word usage is different in LazyPlusV3+ & SubredditV5+, Check here for keywords)
FAQ
Comments (61)
can you help explain the difference between 2.0, 3.0a, and 3.0b? what are the differences/improvements? is 3.0a and 3.0b just preference, or 3.0b is 'better?' thanks
It would be nice to have these basic things explained since they all share the same page, wouldn't it?
They're version numbers. Higher is better. A means alpha. B means beta. Use 3b, it's the latest and best.
And it is explained. Says it uses the updated lazymix base. So you go the lazymix model page and find out what's changed.
@nonamebrand Version numbers say little sometimes because Higher being better is not always the case. Often models will be better for an older version for X type of gens and higher version for Y, etc...many model pages on this site testify to that sort of thing, so it's not unreasonable for me to ask for a better description of model differences since you have ZERO currently mentioned vs. sending me to another page. Thanks anyway.
@clevnumb I'm not the creator of the model and even I could figure it out lol
@nonamebrand Good for you. I prefer it done how most models on this site are done is all.
Sorry for the late response and yes the versioning is like how software versioning is. Let me clear things up.
3.0 is in the works to be the latest release. Its been uploaded in alpha and beta in order to push updates containing the newer versions of the subreddit model into the mix.
3.0b might not be much different from a 3.0 because I'm pretty satisfied with B and I haven't had a lot of time to work on the model recently. Funny how half of those models that got funded/sponsored never received updates either though.
In short,
2.1 introduces more models to the mix that seemed to bring out a lot of detail without changing what the images present too much. So an improvement.
3.0a was made at the same time and is more similar to 2.0 but with an updated version of Subreddit. Simple as that.
3.0b introduced the same improvements made to 2.1 but with an updated subreddit model and an updated lazy mix base. So this is the most improved version at the moment.
would be so good to see Cyberrealistic being added to the mix ! its the only realistic model that give me good human faces and anatomy, thx
I am not getting realistic pics. do you have any suggestions?
@TulisP "deformed, anime" ONLY in the negative. do not add "low quality, worst quality, funky arms, mutated pussy" shit.
try "dark lighting" or "studio lighting" in the prompt. again, no "masterpiece, ultra HD 8K, highly detailed skin" garbage.
Best model ever! I'm loving it. The girls are soooo realistic. BTW, I haven't figured out how to change these areola into smaller ones.
This is a very underrated model, which blows away the competition in the female anatomy department. Wanted to thank you for the efforts, and beg for updates.
Does someone know the merge recipe? I would like to try the newest Subreddit V7 that was retrained for SD 1.5 instead of 1.4 but this mix only has V6
Kaylazy did not disclose the recipe, When I used this great model, I could see that it is close to Reliberate - v2.0, but more spicy. In any case, the confirmed ones are Dreamlike Photoreal 2.0 and SubReddit V3 models
@Diioo That is something I found here on civit as a model string on an image post by Kaylazy: 0.8(0.75(0.67(0.5(LazyBase_v1-2 + 0.95(subredditV6 - sd-v1-4)) + 0.5(urpmv13)) + 0.33(basedModel_v10)) + 0.25(epicrealism_pureEvolutionV3)) + 0.2(aZovyaPhotoreal_v2) + 0.15(N_sxd_10Pruned - Models_v1-5-pruned-emaonly) I just have no clue what basedModel and N_sxd_10 are. I know the other models but not those 2 well and LazyBase
could you please make an inpainting model
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/How-to-make-your-own-Inpainting-model
It's fairly straightforward to make your own! The lazymix inpainter I made following these instructions works wonderfully.
@j8888498159 could you maybe share yours?
Hi I am a newbie. Regarding the following tips, how do I settings the A1111?
The example images cannot be reproduced unless you toggle the: Do not make DPM++ SDE deterministic across different batch sizes setting, found in the Compatibility tab of A1111's settings.
how to achieve the same face when ever i generate is it possible ??
Hey.
I'm using this with SD-CN Animation and 1111's telling me I'm not using the right YAML file.
I'm still pretty new to this without a computer background, and can't find reference to this either here or on the web.
Any info I can use regarding this?
Thanks!
Love this model. :)
can this model generate SFW? It looks like the best realistic model here, but it would be a bummer if it could only make NSFW
It can. its just a horny model so you might have to be firm with the horny bat if you get what I mean.
Like using negative prompts like nude, naked, nsfw and describing the clothes the subject is wearing to deter it from drawing the subject naked
@firedelta5 I see, thx
@FriskTemmie You could download Nag_'s Un-horny LoRa and turn it all the way the max.
At least that worked for me.
Link: https://civitai.com/models/101567/concept-un-horny
Unfortunately this seems to be as good as it gets for hardcore NSFW. It's a good model, but highly tends to produce images that lack any 'style'. They tend to look like amateur photos taken on a phone, which of course is to be expected and I can't complain about that. I just wish there was a 1.5 model with as good a capability for realistic NSFW hardcore that also had the style and polish of other popular photo/realistic models.
Use some of the NSFW Loras, they do a pretty good job
Best model that quickly loads for non-SDXL NSFW!
Thank you very much!
good shit
tbh would like to see more emo girl
This is the best NSFW model out there. Better then all SDXL I've tested so far. Especially for inpainting. Please keep maintaining this :)
you can make your own: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/How-to-make-your-own-Inpainting-model
i created one for you: https://mega.nz/file/WIEFRSyK#6umi_a0YL50BzzGA1Z9xrNmkGSg2Nfw1teo4VHIJyyQ
@pkmngotrnr Serious question. Why do you need inpainting? I find using auto1111 it works with any of them. I know it is a noob question but if you have time let me know.
@KINGLIFER can you maybe tell me? i have no clue and research in this topci seems like overwhelmingly lots of conntect that is outdated....any keywords or specific tutorials to look out for?
@pkmngotrnr hey man thanks for the checkpoint merge. I tried to do my own, but I effed up at some point I guess and was getting weird images, so I just downloaded yours and it works for inpainting
@KINGLIFER you don't, unless you're using it for inpainting specifically. Checkpoints do not work for inpainting unless stated otherwise (some have an inpainting version as optional download). Same with LORA's, some work, some don't. But if a lora isn't working for inpaint, nothing will happen. If the checkpoint is not meant for inpainting, you'll get completely screwed up images.
Heey! Great work! Bet you have experience my team needs for our project. How about we collaborate?
If you're interested, could you share your email or Telegram to discuss this?
Great work. Allow me a newbie question. How can you use the same model in different variation? I just started AI creation yesterday, I made some stuff, but models faces change everytime...Sorry for this noob question
Seed #'s. Play around with them. Keep he first few digits of a seed you like (say the first 4) and randomize all the ones there after, repeat.
Repeat again.
i would suggest using reactor. download/save the face model you want and then use reactor so it will faceswap on the last step of generation
@Legend_of_Chavo_G thanks!
@blackfirelouis thanks!
where do i find the trigger words? i dont get it..
trigger words are for loras, this is a checkpoint. so like the image base that then gets influenced by loras, if you select it as a checkpoint in lets say a1111 it'll be used in every single txt2image or img2img prompt you provide, no need for trigger words.
whats the mix? what is Vae??
Is a post-processing tool, find it in your webUI settings
Mix - two or more checkpoints mixed together. Vae - a decoder/encoder for latent image. It's not really important, the creator just mentioned that if you want to recreate his pictures you'd need to use a different vae that's not included in this checkpoint.
why does the checkpoint add more torsos at higher res?
It's made with 512*512 in mind. Generate at lower res and use an upscaler.
Faceswap don't work with this model???
For inpainting you usually need a model that's specified it's for inpainting. I recommend EpicPhotoGasm, it has a version that's good for inpainting.
My New Goto...No one generates a pussy like LazyMix+
I agree. I usually go to EpicPhotoGasm for good and accurate hands, and this one for everything else when generating pictures of girls
Can checkpoint be used in draw things app?
Anyone else getting “Blocked By Provider” when trying to use this model and know how to fix it? Been getting this for about a minute nth and can’t produce NSFW images using this model,
very realistic.... Is it the source images? How could I reach out to the author for some questions (willing to pay for a custom model)
Version 3.0b and version 2.1 of this model have trouble producing neutral facial expressions. If you put "smiling" in a negative prompt they will produce images of girls with their mouths open in some sort of shock / surpise facial expression. This was happening with 2.0 and 1.0 but to a much lesser extent and only with more complex samplers. 3.0b and 2.1 also exhibit heavy artifacts with DPM++ 2M SDE Heun sampler (30 steps) where 1.0 and 2.0 didn't.
A new version should be available now or soon. Let me know if there's any difference.
will the model get update? and/or XL version?
I do plan on updating it with updated models in the mix.
However, I have not delved into any SDXL content creation. So, as for now, there are no plans for an XL version.
Details
Files
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
Mirrors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_V30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lzymx.safetensors
test.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
lazymixRealAmateur_v30b.safetensors
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.


















