CivArchive
    GonzaLomo Z-Image Refiner Workflow - CZXL
    NSFW
    Preview 113827948
    Preview 113776310
    Preview 113779373
    Preview 113814466
    Preview 113829603

    This workflow is intended to be used with the Z-Image Turbo model to generate an image and then refine the image using the GonzaLomo V6.0 Photo XL model. V6.0 will provide the image with much better detailed anatomical features.

    Note that it's not required to use the GonzaLomo SDXL model as any photorealistic SDXL model should do a very good job at refining the Z-Image image.

    The different detailers require separate models that should go in your ComfyUI /models/ultralytics/bbox folder. I've uploaded them to this model page here but you can also find these files here and here.

    Description

    CZXL = Chroma->ZImageTurbo->SDXL

    This is a very experimental (and slow) workflow that uses Chroma to create the initial image because I think it has superior composition and color. Also, Chroma provides a wider diversity of faces and body types than ZIT, in addition to much better NSFW options.

    The entire image is then passed to ZImageTurbo to be refined on a high denoise, ~0.60, because ZIT provides superior realistic textures.

    Finally, there are some optional SDXL refiners to fix the naughty bits that ZIT tends to mess up.

    I find that this workflow provides the best of all worlds for me but I wish it wasn't necessary. Hopefully we get much better trained ZIT models and that can take over completely. For now, this is the workflow I'm using on a regular basis.

    Please provide me some feedback! I'd like to make this better and/or fix any problems that anyone discovers.

    P.S. The quality of the resulting image is going to be totally defined by the different denoise settings. You can play around with the ZIT denoise a lot and go anywhere from 0.15 to 0.75. Also, the SDXL detailers have their own denoise settings that you can play with to increase/decrease the amount of detail they provide.

    P.P.S I haven't added any upscaling in this initial version but I will in the next. I'm considering SeedVR2 as the upscaler.

    FAQ

    Comments (28)

    Alright123Dec 14, 2025
    CivitAI

    I have a character lora on Z-Image, but not on SDXL or Chroma. Can I still have good results with it by switching the models to ZIT instead?

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 15, 2025

    I think you should be fine just adding the character lora to the ZIT model pipeline. You'll probably want to set the ZIT denoise setting to 0.70 just so you get as much of the character as possible without changing the rest of the image too much. There might be a little trial and error needed to find the right denoise value.

    You'll also want to make sure your prompt accurately describes the character so that the Chroma generation can at least get pretty close.

    iamsaso654321987Dec 15, 2025
    CivitAI

    Thank you for sharing doesn't work with chroma Bf16 or it's only work with bf8


    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 15, 2025

    It should work fine with any kind of Chroma and model loader. BF16, FP16, FP8 or GGUF shouldn't matter as long as it provides a model output.

    milt68Dec 15, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Outstanding idea and implementation. Props to you.

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 15, 2025

    Thanks!

    Geckos_1999Dec 16, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Hi, I made this using a workflow modified from yours. Those modifications are mostly visual, but you may wanna check it out, just saying. 😘
    https://civitai.com/images/114096031

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 16, 2025

    Very cool, great job!

    MarieGemDec 18, 2025
    CivitAI

    doesn't work, all text inputs are blocked except for detailer, detailers themselves have messed up settings with missing inputs. also could use a sfw version

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 18, 2025

    Which version of the workflow are you having trouble with?

    wangxiaocaoJan 29, 2026

    close Nodes 2.0

    kn345597Dec 18, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Took me a few goes experimenting with the Chroma sampler/scheduler to find the sweet spot, but once you find it, it's super sweet. Probably the best (most realistic) skin textures I've ever achieved. Thanks GBRX, another awesome addition to your collection. Cheers 😽

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 18, 2025· 1 reaction

    Awesome, thanks!

    iamaritomix545Dec 18, 2025
    CivitAI

    Hi friend. I'm having trouble getting my LoRa models to work. I have models in Z Image and SDXL. I don't know which LoRa I could put in the other LoRa node. Or how I can get it to use the LoRa from my model? Thanks

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 18, 2025

    Which workflow are you using?

    iamaritomix545Dec 18, 2025

    @GBRX Hi friend. GonzaLomo Z-Image Refiner Workflow

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 19, 2025

    @iamaritomix545 Yes, but which version? CZXL, v1.1 or v1.0?

    iamaritomix545Dec 19, 2025

    @GBRX gonzaLomo_CZXL1

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 19, 2025· 2 reactions

    @iamaritomix545 For that workflow it would only make sense to use the Z-Image lora. Just select it in the Power Lora Loader in the Z-Image Turbo Refiner group. The only problem is that there is a bug in the workflow. The Z-Image Power Lora Loader is not connected to the Refiner KSampler so you'll need to do that manually. I'll have an update for this workflow soon that fixes this.

    DirtyBeaglesDec 21, 2025

    @GBRX This is what I am doing with your workflow. for the Chroma Base, I have no character lora applied. For the zimage node, I am selecting my character lora and connected the lora to the refiner ksampler like you mentioned. It will not generate my character from the zimage lora. Thoughts? It seems to be similar problem that the pervious person was having.

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 21, 2025· 1 reaction

    @DirtyBeagles What is your denoise setting on the Z-Image refiner sampler? It probably needs to be at least 0.60, if not higher, for the Z-Image lora to be fully in effect. Idally, you would want to use the same dataset to create a Chroma lora as well and apply them both, if you have access to the dataset.

    crankybuttercupDec 22, 2025
    CivitAI

    I like the refining approach! Z-Image is so great, but lacks in certain areas. Question: Your workflow uses bbox/Nipples.pt and you link in the description to where is supposedly found. However, there are no YOLO models with that exact name. When I download nipples_yolov8s.pt and use it in the detailer, it just isn't picked up. It has no effect. Any guidance here?

    crankybuttercupDec 22, 2025

    After updating ComfyUI and all the nodes, it is having an effect. However, I've gotten much better and more realistic results using bbox/female_breast-v4.2.pt. Just my feedback on your 1.1 workflow. You generate really high-quality images, so I'm sure I still have something off, but it's much better now!

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 23, 2025· 1 reaction

    @crankybuttercup Thanks for the feedback. I need to look into the issues with the bbox models and possibly host them myself.

    crankybuttercupDec 29, 2025

    @GBRX Thanks for sharing the detailers! I can confirm they give better results!

    GBRX
    Author
    Dec 29, 2025· 1 reaction

    @crankybuttercup Great! I wish I had a better solution. Those detailers have been a pain.

    dan828Dec 23, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Nice work, friend. Thanks for sharing it with us.

    zagzagem685Dec 26, 2025
    CivitAI
    Bro, for some reason the nipple detailer isn't working.

    Workflows
    ZImageTurbo
    by GBRX

    Details

    Downloads
    5,124
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    12/14/2025
    Updated
    5/14/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    gonzalomoZImage_czxl.zip

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)

    gonzalomoZImage_czxl.zip

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)