Body type slider
(+) - narrow hips, narrow waist
(-) - wide hips, wide waist
Description
FAQ
Comments (7)
Do you have a body fat slider? Skinny -> Fat
Good but it changes head size more than it changes body size -_-
maybe, on the contrary, the body becomes smaller relative to the head, have you ever wondered?
@llikswonskcalb I understand where you are coming from but end result isn't that. Its simply effecting the head a bit too much.
For example see this, the only difference is +4 Lora. Similar stuff happens with negative as well.
https://www.diffchecker.com/image-compare/TcF14iXG/
@jfmlol I completely see what you mean in the comparison, and visually, you are 100% right — the head definitely looks bigger. Let me explain why this happens under the hood, because it’s actually a fascinating quirk of how LoRAs and composition work.
During the training of this slider, no head-related tokens or images were used. The slider is trained strictly on one rule:
Negative values = wider hips and waist (larger lower body).
Positive values = narrower hips and waist (smaller lower body).
When you go to +4, the LoRA aggressively shrinks the mass of the lower body, just as intended. However, because the background and the camera frame stay static, your eyes naturally use them as a reference point.
To fix this visual side-effect when pushing the LoRA to high values like +4, I'd recommend slightly adjusting your negative prompt (e.g., adding words like big head).
@llikswonskcalb Thanks for the explanation. I am not familiar with the technical side of things, maybe its making this because it kinda looks like a age change?
https://www.diffchecker.com/image-compare/c2YBABTz/
Because I could understand if body got larger so head got smaller (to fit both on screen), but it simply shrinks/enlarges head even tho body's size in the image is same.
amazing, A slider to improve the hands and fingers?