BEANFLK — Masturbation LoRA with Audio

Built for one thing most video models won't do: her fingers actually going in.

Trigger: BEANFLK — all caps, first word of your prompt.

Why this exists

Ask almost any video model for a woman fingering herself and you'll get a hand rubbing around on the outside, forever. It'll look fine. She'll never actually go in.

That's the problem this LoRA was built to solve. Fingers pushing in deep until her knuckles press against her, working inside her, and drawing back out wet. That's the whole point of it — everything else here is built around making that one thing land.

The dataset was assembled specifically for it: entry and withdrawal balanced clip for clip, every window cut so the insertion finishes inside the frame instead of getting trimmed off halfway through, and a bucket of clean anatomy footage so the model knows what it's drawing when the hand moves away.

What else it does

• Audio — wet sounds, breathing, moans and a real climax, generated with the video rather than dubbed on.

• Climax — hips lifting and bucking, her pussy clenching in waves. Trained as its own thing, not just a hand moving faster.

• Depth control — fingertips barely dipping in, or all the way to the knuckle. Both are trained, and you can ask for either.

• Rubbing and teasing — the build-up, so it isn't only good at the main event.

• Expression — she reads as enjoying it, rather than operating a hand.

Two versions — and they are not equal

MiniMax H3 — use this one.

• Insertion fires at 0.40. Normal strength, no overdriving, no artifacts.

• It will start the action for you. Give it a frame where her hands are up by her chest and it brings them down and begins the whole thing on its own.

• Rebuilt from scratch: 1,775 clips across 14 sources, entry and withdrawal balanced clip for clip, every window cut so the insertion finishes inside the frame.

• Climax trained as its own thing — hips bucking and lifting, not just a hand moving faster.

• Audio trained jointly with the video in the same pass.

LTX-2.3 / Eros — the original.

• Insertion needs 1.75, and only works if the source image already has her hand at or above the opening. It won't start the action from a cold frame.

• Push much past 1.69 and artifacts creep in — nipples moving faster than the breast, breast growth on flat-chested subjects.

• The audio and the rubbing are genuinely good, and it's still the right choice if LTX is your pipeline.

Straight answer: the H3 version is better at the thing this LoRA exists for, and it isn't close. The LTX build was made first, before a lot of what we learned about cutting the dataset for insertion. If you can run H3, run H3.

An LTX update is coming. Everything that made the H3 version work — the rebalanced dataset, the recut windows, the dedicated climax and anatomy footage — applies to LTX too. It just hasn't been baked yet. If you're on LTX, this page is worth watching.

Each version box carries its own settings. The numbers do not transfer. LTX runs strengths above 1.0; H3 runs well under it.

Prompting

You are not limited to what it was trained on. This sits on top of a capable base model — ask for a different setting, a different position, her licking her fingers afterwards, and the base handles it while the LoRA supplies the action and the sound.

Put BEANFLK first, then describe the scene and the action. The H3 version box has a full word list showing which phrases pull which behaviour.

A note on close-ups

At extreme macro framing the base model's own anatomy becomes the limiting factor rather than this LoRA. Each version box says what to stack for that platform. At normal and wide framing you don't need anything extra.

Every gallery clip lists its full prompt and the exact LoRA stack that made it.