Fucktoy Ethots & CamGlam Sluts — Krea 2
Vintage Glamour. Gothic Seduction. Modern Photorealism.
About the Model
Beauty has never belonged to just one era.
From the soft, romantic lighting of 1940s Hollywood portraits to the provocative fashion editorials of the 1980s and 1990s, glamour photography has constantly reinvented itself. Each generation brought its own interpretation of beauty, confidence, theatricality, and visual storytelling.
Fucktoy Ethots & CamGlam Sluts — Krea 2 draws inspiration from those changing aesthetics, blending decades of photographic influence into a contemporary, cinematic visual style.
The goal was to create a model capable of capturing the atmosphere of classic glamour photography while embracing the sharp detail, dramatic lighting, and striking visual language of modern digital depravity and of course, many many styles of beautiful fucktoys to play with.
Aesthetic Influences Across the Eras
1940s–1950s | The Golden Age of Hollywood
Soft-focus portraits, carefully sculpted lighting, luminous complexions, platinum-blonde bombshells, and the timeless sophistication of classic studio photography. An era when a single portrait could convey an entire personality.
1960s–1970s | The Rise of the Glamour Icon
Bolder personalities, expressive styling, luxurious interiors, rich colors, and the increasingly adventurous visual language of fashion and beauty photography.
1980s | High Glamour and Excess
Big hair, glossy makeup, dramatic silhouettes, theatrical lighting, metallic accessories, and unapologetic extravagance. The decade that made glamour larger than life.
1990s–2000s | Editorial Edge
High-fashion photography meets alternative culture. Dark lipstick, leather, PVC, gothic influences, dramatic studio setups, and the polished aesthetic of glossy editorial magazines.
2010s–2020s | Digital Glamour and Hyperrealism
Ultra-detailed photography, cinematic color grading, shallow depth of field, realistic skin texture, and modern influencer-era visual aesthetics.
The Creative Vision
This model explores the intersection of these influences, combining classic beauty, gothic atmosphere, modern fashion, and cinematic realism.
Think candlelit castles, crimson velvet, polished stone, dramatic shadows, elaborate jewelry, platinum hair, reflective materials, and striking portraiture.
The emphasis is on:
Photorealistic skin with natural texture, subtle imperfections, and believable highlights.
Cinematic lighting with rich reds, warm candlelight, deep shadows, and carefully controlled contrast.
Glamour-inspired faces with expressive eyes, detailed makeup, and distinctive styling.
Realistic materials including glossy PVC, polished metal, velvet, stone, and reflective surfaces.
Editorial composition featuring intimate portraits, dramatic environments, and shallow depth of field.
Atmospheric storytelling that gives each image a sense of place, personality, and visual identity.
The objective isn't simply to make everything sharper or more polished. It's to create images that feel photographed rather than artificially assembled.
Prompting Tips
This model is intended for richly descriptive, photography-oriented prompts.
For best results, consider describing:
NSFW Styles: Over 250 NSFW and Porn Concepts - Like Pokemon, Discover and Catch them all
Subject: Hair, eyes, makeup, expression, pose, and styling.
Era: Vintage Hollywood, 1980s high glamour, 1990s editorial, or contemporary cinematic photography.
Environment: Gothic architecture, luxurious interiors, professional studios, or atmospheric historical settings.
Lighting: Crimson rim lighting, candlelight, soft beauty lighting, or dramatic directional illumination.
Camera language: DSLR photography, 85mm portrait lens, f/1.4 aperture, shallow depth of field, and soft background bokeh.
Finishing: Realistic skin texture, natural photographic detail, rich color grading, and an editorial film aesthetic.
The more clearly you establish the visual era and photographic environment, the more intentionally you can guide the overall aesthetic.
Available Versions — BF16 & ConvRot
This model is available in two formats: BF16 and ConvRot. Both are based on the same creative model, but they serve different hardware configurations and performance needs.
BF16 — Full-Precision Master
Best for: Maximum fidelity, high-end GPUs, and users who want the original model weights without additional quantization.
BF16 is the full-size master checkpoint and preserves the model's weights without the additional compression introduced by ConvRot.
Approximately 24 GB of model weights.
Recommended for GPUs with 32 GB or more VRAM, or systems with sufficient RAM and model offloading.
Ideal for image-quality comparisons, benchmarking, and future model experimentation.
Requires more memory and may involve longer loading times.
Choose BF16 if image fidelity is your priority and you have the hardware to support it.
ConvRot — Optimized for Efficiency
Best for: Lower VRAM usage, more efficient model loading, and everyday image generation.
ConvRot uses quantization to reduce the memory required for model weights while aiming to preserve the visual character of the BF16 master.
Smaller model footprint than BF16.
Reduced memory requirements, depending on the specific ConvRot configuration.
Better suited to users who want to conserve VRAM for larger resolutions or additional workflow components.
May introduce minor differences in fine details, textures, and image output compared with BF16.
Choose ConvRot if you want a more memory-efficient version without giving up the model's overall aesthetic.
Important Notes
Both versions are intended to produce the same overall photographic style. Differences in speed, VRAM consumption, and image fidelity will depend on your hardware, workflow, and quantization implementation.
The model's creative identity remains the same — choose the version that best fits your system.
Description
FAQ
Comments (2)
Please add more prompt examples. So far all the outputs are the same no matter what year is included in the prompt.
Also seed variance in faces seems locked even when facial features are not specified
Thanks for the feedback! Just to clarify, the references to different eras in the model description are about the aesthetic influences behind the merge, not a feature that lets you select a decade by typing a year.
Krea 2 responds best to descriptive, natural-language prompts. Rather than simply specifying "1985" or "1950," describe the actual visual elements associated with that era—hairstyles, makeup, wardrobe, lighting, film characteristics, and photographic techniques.
This model is intentionally biased toward a particular glamour aesthetic, so some visual consistency is expected. That said, I'll take a closer look at your observation about facial variation across seeds.
Here is an example of what i mean:
A glamorous 28-year-old platinum blonde Hollywood bombshell photographed in a lavish 1960s Technicolor-inspired publicity portrait. Voluminous bouffant hairstyle with sculpted curls, dramatic winged black eyeliner, thick false eyelashes, glossy coral-red lipstick, porcelain skin with a warm luminous complexion, and an unmistakably playful expression. She reclines elegantly on a luxurious emerald-green velvet chaise lounge, wearing a shimmering champagne-gold satin evening gown with a plunging neckline, elaborate rhinestone earrings, and a sparkling diamond bracelet. Her surroundings feature extravagant gold-framed mirrors, rich ruby-red velvet curtains, polished marble, and ornate Hollywood Regency furnishings. Brilliant three-point studio lighting with warm tungsten highlights, saturated primary colors, rich emerald greens, vivid reds, and luminous golden skin tones. Classic Eastmancolor motion-picture film aesthetic, Technicolor-inspired color separation, subtle halation around highlights, delicate analog film grain, smooth tonal transitions, and beautifully sculpted facial lighting. Photographed on vintage 35mm Kodak color negative film using period-correct Hollywood portrait techniques. Authentic mid-century glamour photography, theatrical composition, vivid cinematic color, beautiful realistic skin texture, sophisticated studio portraiture, unmistakable 1960s visual character.







