CivArchive
    Roses For Men XL - v4.2BakedVAE
    NSFW
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined
    Preview undefined

    RosesForMen V4.3:

    All the credits are on the "about this version" section.

    I think this version is more solid than the others, the improvement is very noticibly.

    As always, is not perfect, but this time the results got better, and I didn't have major issues with this model in comparison, it needs some fixes on fingers and hands, maybe an eye but overall gives good results, and you can use this same model for inpainting simple things.

    Pros:

    -Better Faces.

    -More stability.

    -Better quality.

    -Cocks looks more realistic. (not perfect)

    -I didn't even use negative prompt.

    Cons:

    -It seems to have issues to produce "far shots", I still don't know how to manage that.

    -It doesn't understand "Flaccid" or "erect" cocks anymore, but can produce Flaccid without asking for it.

    -Still needs upscale to get the best results.

    Another tip: It seems to fix some issues by doing 15 steps instead of 10, but sometimes 10 steps follow the prompt better so it depends on your preference.

    My recommendations for better results:

    Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras (it also works well with Euler a / DPM++ 2S a Karras)
    Upscaling method: Latent
    Denoising strenght: 0,7

    Upscale by: 1,3 to 1,5

    Steps: 10 to 20


    It's not perfect and also in some images may have some gray spots like in the examples, and since I have almost no knowledge about merging and how to fix some things or maybe make better prompts, I'll let anyone use this merge to improve it and give feedback to make it even better.

    First I want to thank and give credits to all of these amazing and talented creators for sharing their models to everyone, so the models I used in this meged base models are:

    LoRas I used were:

    Again, thanks to all of these creators, and also as they request, is not allowed for commercial porpuses.

    The configuration I used:

    Sampling method: DPM++ 2M SDE Karras (I haven't tried another method so feel free to try)

    Sampling steps: 20-30 steps

    Resolution; 768x1024, 1024x1024

    Some words that worked for me in the prompt are "photography, ethereal, aestheticism, cinematic photography"

    And for negative I used "((head out of frame)), asymmetric face, blurry, Facial hair, anime, cartoon, graphic, text, painting, crayon, graphite, abstract, glitch, deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, head out of focus, head blurry, necklace, big forehead, earrings,".

    But you can try yours too.

    Since my pc is low specs feel free to try it with other methods, different steps and everything you want, I apologize for not testing it more.

    I will be glad if you use and share some pictures of your own results.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (2)

    NeylJul 5, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Straight up my fav male model, it produces superb photorealistic results and it follows the prompts very nicely, making it very easy to push different of ethnicities and body types while other models/merges always seem to have a bias. Thank you for your work, please don't stop updating it! ❤️

    JKf_05
    Author
    Jul 6, 2024· 1 reaction

    Thank you so much! I'm glad you like this model, I'm actually about to post the new version soon!

    Checkpoint
    SDXL 1.0

    Details

    Downloads
    157
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    6/25/2024
    Updated
    5/20/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    rosesForMenXL_v42bakedvae.safetensors

    Mirrors