CivArchive
    Preview 62568578
    Preview 62568574
    Preview 62568569
    Preview 62568573
    Preview 62568570
    Preview 62568576

    Anima version is available!

    Nova Furry XL

    A 2d/2.5d furry checkpoint model that can have great details on any type of furs, scales and feathers, which aims to be XL-fied Peaki Furry

    SeaArtAI

    OurtAI

    PixAI - IL v18.0B

    PixAI - IL v18.0A

    PixAI - IL v17.0

    PixAI - IL v16.0

    PixAI - IL v15.5

    PixAI - IL v15.0

    PixAI - IL v14.0

    PixAI - IL v13.5

    PixAI - IL v13.0

    PixAI - IL v12.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v11.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v10.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v9B

    PixAI - Illustrious v9A

    PixAI - Illustrious v8B

    PixAI - Illustrious v8A

    PixAI - Illustrious v7B

    PixAI - Illustrious v7A

    PixAI - Illustrious v6B

    PixAI - Illustrious v6A

    PixAI - Illustrious v5.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v4.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v3.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v0.8

    PixAI - Illustrious v1.0

    PixAI - Illustrious v2.0

    PixAI - v1.0

    PixAI - v2.0

    PixAI - v3.0

    PixAI - v4.0

    PixAI - v5.0

    PixAI - v6.0

    tensorART

    Rules

    You cannot use the generated images for commercial use if it's not edited (or just turning it to black and white)

    Advertising is always welcome

    Sampler: Euler a for best performance

    Steps: 20-50 steps

    (Pony)

    CFG Scale: 6-7

    Prompt: score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, score_5_up, score_4_up, source_furry, BREAK, furry, anthro, detailed face eyes and fur, {Animal Type}

    Negative Prompt: blurry, jpeg artifacts, username, watermark, signature, normal quality, worst quality, large head, low quality, text, error, missing fingers, extra digits, fewer digits, bad eye

    (Illustrious)

    CFG Scale: 3-5

    Prompt: masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, high resolution, ultra-detailed, absurdres, newest, scenery, furry, anthro, {Prompt}, BREAK, depth of field, detailed fluffy fur, volumetric lighting

    Negative Prompt: human, multiple tails, modern, recent, old, oldest, graphic, cartoon, text, painting, crayon, graphite, abstract, glitch, deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, long body, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra digits, fewer digits, cropped, very displeasing, (worst quality, bad quality:1.2), bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, simple background, conjoined, bad ai-generated

    Description

    Improved posing and details
    Noob EPS 1.1 and Illustrious 1.0 DARE applied

    FAQ

    Comments (84)

    daspin335Mar 10, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Wanted to say I love all of your models and they are the best go-to, but I will say that with the latest V5 version, I have been running into many issues with it over V4, 3, and 2, but I still think its a great set of models regardless

    WizardegenerateMar 14, 2025

    What kind of issues? Just curious. Loving v4.0!

    daspin335Mar 14, 2025· 1 reaction

    @Wizardegenerate mostly generations that come out with unusual fractals and geometric shapes even when i would use compatible prompts that worked perfect for all of the previous models, deleted it and redownloaded the model and it started working fine, so im not sure if it was an error with the download (rare but i guess possible) or some other error happening, its working perfect now but honestly i do also prefer V4

    RashyMar 19, 2025

    @daspin335 I still have v4, so maybe I wait until it improves more, until then I rather don't risk it - never touch a winning system, right?

    GUSAMAMar 10, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I have a problem and need help. This is my first time using this and I'm not sure if it can work in DrawThings, because the resulting photos are very blurry. I have already used the recommendation prompts and the recommendation Settings

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 10, 2025

    Use hires.fix or higher steps

    Increasing CFG scale would also help
    Also, I uploaded the model into PixAI as well
    try it out!

    GUSAMAMar 12, 2025

    Thanks,it's useful on pixai, but I still can't use it on DrawThings, probably because of the device (iPad 2022Pro)@Crody 

    RashyMar 19, 2025

    DrawThings is very weird in several ways, sadly. I have a M1Max Macbook and gave it a try, but in the end I just prefer Forge WebUI (by alot). More settings, less drama, almost similar performance. But yeah, on iPad you need DrawThings.

    Nash11Mar 10, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    I'm trying to copy some of those prompts on different models v30-50 but result is always different. The pose is the same but its like worse quality, its always looking like 20% worse, not sure why.

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 10, 2025· 1 reaction

    I forgot adding meta tag about hires.fix

    jackov5162872Mar 11, 2025

    @Crody are you gonna put them here? Can't seem to find them anywhere.

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 11, 2025· 3 reactions

    @jackov5162872 Same tag, 0.4 Denoise, Same CFG scale, 40*0.4 Steps and x1.5 resolution

    jackov5162872Mar 13, 2025

    @Crody many thanks

    csielpar135152Mar 10, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Thanks for the update, very based.

    abcdefghsaMar 10, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Oh yeah baby new version!!!!!

    RedactedPawsMar 11, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    With the new generator update, you should totally turn on on-site generation. I can only use this model when a buddy turns on remote-share 🥺

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 11, 2025

    They already are

    RedactedPawsMar 11, 2025

    @Crody It wasn't when I commented... But now it is! SO I'M GOING ALL OUT NOW!!!

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 11, 2025

    @RedactedPaws The best setting: Text-to-Image Hires Fix
    Use recommended prompt and negative prompt
    CFG with 4.5, steps 20, denoise 0.4

    anomedraMar 11, 2025

    @Crody Psh. I'm so lazy I never actually change my steps when working on an image. All I do is adjust the denoise level: .3-.4 for hires and .2-.3 for face fix/inpainting. Been working great so far. ;)

    RedactedPawsMar 18, 2025

    It was great while it lasted. Having all the checkpoints available was too much for them.

    amogussususMar 18, 2025

    Btw i don't know how it works why is not available anymore?

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 18, 2025

    @amogussusus Read the latest Announcement

    amogussususMar 18, 2025

    @Crody Oh welp, seems i have to use it on yodayo again. Still cool model btw.

    anomedraMar 11, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I've been doing some testing with the on-site generation, and for some reason Civit mistakenly thinks a lot of the LoRA models I tend to use with Nova Furry are incompatible with v4/v5 Illustrious, since they don't show up in search or can't be added in any way. Somehow it only lets me use up to v3 for them.

    It seems to be an already existing issue because when I was uploading local gens it didn't let me manually add said models (that don't automatically get recognized by the system for whatever reason) for them either because the search would just show up blank. So the best I could do was to post them in the specific models' feeds. ~shrug~

    d_starsMar 11, 2025

    I noticed the site recently added separate tags for NoobAI and Illustrious. Nova Furry v4+ changed over to that new Noob tag from the Illust one. That looks like the source of your issue.

    anomedraMar 11, 2025

    @d_stars Well, that's going to be a problem for anyone who wants to web gen with Nova Furry now... with Civit's generator making the actually compatible models unavailable to users that way.

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 11, 2025

    If you look down Setting, you can see Advanced mode on Generation Setting

    Please allow it

    For search, I think they will fix the issue

    anomedraMar 12, 2025

    @Crody Well, I'll be... Took me a bit to figure out what you meant, as the 'cog' symbol in the search box is so very much missable, and I've been using this site for the better part of a year already. Good luck having a newcomer figuring this kind of shit out. Heh. =/

    amogussususMar 14, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    One of the best models here. And despite the name it is really good with non furries.

    kocten7Mar 14, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Hi. Is it just me or does Illustrious v5.0 generate worse fingers? Can you recommend something? Thanks in advance.

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 14, 2025

    Including extra digits, fewer digits in Negative Prompt would do the job

    WizardegenerateMar 14, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Illustrious v4.0 is actually one of the most versatile models I've ever ran. It can do almost anything. It's quickly becoming my baseline for local generations. Other models do closer face closeups, but I haven't noticed any other major weaknesses.

    pavlik9425Mar 14, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    Hi, I'm a recent user of ComfyUI, I'm trying out different checkpoints right now. The Illustrious v5.0 version has a lot of graininess, does anyone know what it's about?

    pavlik9425Mar 14, 2025

    Prompt: furry, anthro, detailed eyes face and fur, {Animal Type}, masterpiece, best quality, stunning quality, very aesthetic, high resolution, ultra detail, absurd, newest, landscape, 1girl, furry, anthro, solo, rabbit, dressed, body fur, brown rabbit, brown fur, fluffy, medium chest, white hair, floating hair, looking at viewer, red eyes, big eyes, worn pink basketball jersey, jersey number 03, worn pink basketball shorts, long rabbit ears, holding machete, full-length, BREAK, eyes, detailed eyes, forest in background, detailed background, detailed hair, depth of field, detailed fluffy fur, photorealistic details, volumetric lighting

    Negative prompt: human, multiple tails, old, oldest, cartoon, graphic, text, painting, crayon, graphite, abstract, glitch, deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, long body, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, very displeasing, (worst quality, bad quality:1.2), bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, simple background, conjoined, bad ai-generated

    Guidance:

    7

    Steps:

    30

    Sampler:

    Euler

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 14, 2025· 1 reaction

    @pavlik9425 Use lower guidance scale around 3-5

    I recommend using 4.5

    Also, using Euler A (Euler Ancestral) would help getting better images

    radoma537Mar 16, 2025· 1 reaction

    I removed smZ Settings node and everything went back to normal, so I guess it has something to do with it.

    lilbikingturtle247Mar 28, 2025

    @pavlik9425 did you find out why it was grainy?

    lilbikingturtle247Mar 28, 2025

    nvm i found out why, i should've been using "euler_ancestral" which is euler a, i didn't know that because unlike A1111, comfy ui just named it differently ig

    some_cultistMar 15, 2025· 16 reactions
    CivitAI

    Great colors and contrasts, and it hits that perfect balance between promptability and creativity. World class work.

    corpulentbody649Mar 18, 2025· 19 reactions
    CivitAI

    Totally bogus this got cut from the site wide generation. This was the BEST model for how low the running cost was.

    EDIT: Yay it's back!

    Agent_WolfMar 18, 2025· 15 reactions
    CivitAI

    can we please have this model back

    it's hard to find something good that is so helpful

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 18, 2025· 2 reactions

    I don't have the power to do it but with enough requests, they (CivitAI team) will probably consider it

    Agent_WolfMar 18, 2025· 1 reaction

    @Crody i hope enough people complain so that we can get it back

    i have tried some other models, but it is not the same

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 18, 2025· 2 reactions

    Now it's available again!

    Agent_WolfMar 19, 2025

    @Crody wuhuuuuuuuu~

    SXCD2719Mar 18, 2025· 20 reactions
    CivitAI

    Its back onlineee!! ❤

    jack12aMar 19, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    testing this tool right now.

    RashyMar 19, 2025· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    Still love and use it (I keep V4 for now) with Forge and either Euler A or DPM 2M Karras at 30 steps and CFG 3.5-4.0. Wanted to add more observations:

    - "It just works" most of the time, very nice

    - While portraits 1536x1024 work great out-of-the box, details only shine when the character is close to the viewer, and for example crouching/kneeling rather than standing at full height. This leads to scenic landscape 1024x1536 renders e.g with a lying/reclining character suffer in detail and clarity. In these cases, even 1.25x upscales barely help and 1.5x has to be used to regain body details and improved eyes

    - Macro/city scenes could benefit from more training (data), they are solid but still just mediocre compared to regular stuff. Examples: Cars of mixed sizes, (crushed vehicles) or (car wrecks) dont really work, (burning buildings) often leads to funny results of lava-like effects under the character's body or explosions or a 'burning vagina' etc., streets are of wrong scale, suburbia/town settings are tricky to create, scenes often lack any green/trees unless manually added with (trees), adding (utility pole) or (traffic light) makes them as tall as high buildings, etc... I am not sure what could help here, but I was surprised how good the old SD1.5 IndigoFurryMixV120 was with macro, so maybe its more of a general SDXL-based issue

    - Great with anime humans (male + female!) probably thanks to the danbooru database

    - I am still a bit uncertain (and up for your recommendations) in terms of step count for 1) initial render and 2) upscale render. I usually do 30 first, and then 30 again (which equals 17 steps at 0.5 denoise in Forge). Should I either increase the first, second, or both numbers for maximum details?

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 20, 2025· 1 reaction

    If the initial render can be ignored on second hires steps, you can decrease the number of initial steps to get good results

    I always use 20 steps for initial steps, 40 steps 0.4 denoise strength (which means 16 steps) for hires setting

    RashyMar 20, 2025

    @Crody thank you, will try!

    JadonyEnjoyerMar 26, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    it appears that adetailer causes halos when using this model. tested on v50/40/30.

    Juan9923Mar 28, 2025· 6 reactions
    CivitAI

    I don't understand, are versions 4 and 5 Illustrious or NoobAI?

    Crody
    Author
    Mar 28, 2025

    V4 is based on Noob EPS 1.1

    V5 however is based on both Noob EPS1.1 and Illustrious v1.0 which can be done by DARE merging

    Lucy27828272Mar 28, 2025· 6 reactions
    CivitAI

    love the model. just wish it knew more styles

    jiajunsongas678Mar 29, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Good model.

    Maumau534334Mar 31, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    My first results had been with the .jpg artefacts in images, but after some research I solved that problem

    6756743Apr 1, 2025· 1 reaction

    having the same issue. how exactly did you solve it?

    WoozziiApr 4, 2025

    Yeah how did you solve it? :(

    KorporateRaiderApr 6, 2025

    For those asking, try changing your sampler/scheduler, that will often cause issues. DPM++ 3M SDE and Euler a are good, I use Karras or SGM Uniform.

    MetallicAchuApr 1, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but what vae should I use?
    Is it baked into the checkpoint?

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 1, 2025· 1 reaction

    It's already baked

    7366440Apr 3, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    absolutely incredible tbh

    freemanx2Apr 4, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Oh damn the Illustrious 3 is not longer available is this because of the auctions results?

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 4, 2025· 1 reaction

    Yes

    freemanx2Apr 4, 2025

    @Crody uhmm I notice v5 is also not on the list when you try to pick a base model on the site generator later I realize it seems to be set for noobai and not illust

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 4, 2025

    @freemanx2 Try using Advanced Mode for Generation Settings via Settings

    freemanx2Apr 4, 2025

    @Crody thanks for that, what a mess with all this checkpoints thing

    ThetaStormer287Apr 4, 2025

    @Crody The auction system is stupid. They should've never brought it back. Because I was literally using 3.0 because it's the only full illustrious version on this model that didn't overwrite some loras too much. And now I can't use it anymore, and forced to use the noobai one that does what I DIDN'T want it to do. The system is absolute BS

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 4, 2025

    @ThetaStormer287 You could and can vote to v3 as well though by changing the model version

    Just don't spread the dislikes to the system itself

    Currently, I'm creating 2 versions for the latest Nova Furry XL

    V6A: Extended from NF ILv5.0

    V6B: Extended from NF ILv3.0

    Hope you like the latter one!

    ThetaStormer287Apr 4, 2025

    @Crody Problem with that is. If I want to use v3 now, I'd need to spend an absurd amount of buzz for that. Which I, do not have. Nor do I have the money. OR EVER, intend to pay for anything on this site with actual money. Because that would be a complete waste of money to me

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 4, 2025

    @ThetaStormer287 At least you can contribute and with many others feeling the same, you can get it eventually

    And I know sure that v3.0 will be available again next week unless they stop auction stuff: which is unlikely to happen

    The 200th model on last one got around 5000 buzz so getting at least 7500 buzz in total would be good enough

    ThetaStormer287Apr 4, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    Let me use Illustrious 3.0. I was using it yesterday, why am I not able to now all of the sudden, some things get messed up if I use 5.0 instead. And I don't like how others look with my results, nor is everything I am using available on PixAi

    Yeah, the pony v6 is no longer available.. da heck?

    pckingApr 6, 2025· 1 reaction

    it's probably the stupid auction system. you have to bid on checkpoints with buzz to be in the generator

    furyguy49605979Apr 6, 2025· 1 reaction

    The bidding system is the worst and is very very unnecessary to have and I would want it to be gone honestly, plus it's an asshole thing to do for generators like this that had a lot of work and effort to not be used on the site again

    furyguy49605979Apr 6, 2025· 1 reaction

    P.s. it was a great when the bidding was never here but now it's just "migrate or download this to use the checkpoint if you wanna generate more" kind of bs

    KemowolfApr 6, 2025

    Why is Illustrious 4, 5, 6a, and 6b labeled as NoobAI?? They don't come out well with Illustrious LoRAs. Please fix :<

    Rika_ArtAIApr 4, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    this is good i guess

    113346Apr 4, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Love this model, I'm not into furries, but it can do NSFW really well.

    7767725Apr 4, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    very versatile, one of my favs for anthro content

    theone23Apr 5, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    fine ig

    BWolf403Apr 5, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Hi. Love this model, use it the most. But want to test other styles, like pencil or brushed for example. There is anyway to achieve this without taging an artist?

    Crody
    Author
    Apr 6, 2025· 2 reactions

    Try using sketch or line art for pencil, impasto or watercolor for brushed