CivArchive
    Preview 985723
    Preview 985734
    Preview 985732
    Preview 985731
    Preview 985721
    Preview 985742
    Preview 985724
    Preview 985722
    Preview 985728
    Preview 985740
    Preview 985736
    Preview 985727
    Preview 985726
    Preview 985735
    Preview 985730
    Preview 985725
    Preview 985741
    Preview 985739
    Preview 985733
    Preview 985812

    AbsoluteReality

    That feeling after you wake up from a dream

    Add a ❤️ to receive future updates. This took much time and effort, please be supportive 🫂
    Do you like what I do? Consider supporting me on Patreon 🅿️ or feel free to buy me a coffee

    For LCM read the version description.

    Additional ecamples for V1.6: https://civarchive.com/posts/353121
    Additional examples for V1: https://civarchive.com/posts/259634
    Amazing gallery by qf22: https://civarchive.com/posts/260939
    Quick face alteration examples using celebrity names and mixing them: https://civarchive.com/posts/274268

    Available on sinkin.ai, Mage.space and many other services

    Suggestions

    • Use between 4.5 and 10 CFG Scale and between 25 and 30 Steps with DPM++ SDE Karras. Worse samplers might need more steps.

    • To reproduce my results you MIGHT have to change these settings:

      • Set "Do not make DPM++ SDE deterministic across different batch sizes." (mostly for v1 examples)

      • Set the ETA Noise Seed Delta (ENSD) to 31337

      • Set CLIP Skip to 2

      • DISABLE face restore. It's terrible, never use it

    • Use simple prompts. Complex prompts might make less realistic pictures because of CLIP bleeding. More complex prompts does not mean better results. Keep it simple.

    • Use ADetailer to enhance faces. Basically every solo portrait I made uses it. You can get my settings by clicking on "copy generation data". I suggest you use denoising under 0.3 to avoid getting always the same face.

    • Use BadDream and UnrealisticDream negative embeddings (BadDream, (UnrealisticDream:1.2)). Add weight to UnrealisticDream between 1.2 and 1.5. Do not use FastNegative or EasyNegative if you aim at realism. However, they're good for artworks.

    • Use Highres.fix with the following settings: Denoising strength: 0.45, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: 8x_NMKD-Superscale_150000_G and as much upscale as you can (my gpu only handles up to x1.8 at 512x768 base resolution, but you can go higher). If you don't have 8x_NMKD-Superscale_150000_G you can probably use another GAN, but it should be easy to find on Google. You can also try Latent with a denoise higher than 0.6, but the result will be harder to control.

    • Try to condition faces by prompting for eye colors, hairstyles, hair color, ethnicity and so on. Even celebrity names do work. This model is pretty good at not making a single face if you play with the context.

    • If the pic is too clean, try to add some ISO noise. Even as a post processing with external tools it will trick the brain enough to make you think "damn, this is a real photo.

    • If you feel the grounded nature of this model is limiting your imagination, try generating on DS6 and then do img2img with this one to bump up the realism.

    Pruned vs full comparison (not highres fixed)


    Brief story of this model

    While working on DreamShaper 6 I made many other models and a crap ton of tests. Some of them were strange mixes with photorealistic models I had previously made, plus new ones and some ISO noise LoRA I made. When I tested the various release candidates of DS6 for photography prompts, this came out on top. While mostly on the losing side with regards to range, flexibility and LoRA compatibility compared to what became DS6, I noticed this was pretty good at recreating photos with very simple and minimalistic prompts. So, why not, I gave it some love and kept working on it, just in time for its initial release.

    Difference with DreamShaper

    Long story short, DS aims at art, this aims at realism. They might overlap a bit, but they have different objectives and different things they're good at. DreamShaper is total freedom and can basically do everything at a high level. This does about one thing and does it extremely well. This still uses DreamShaper as base, so it's capable of doing art to a lesser degree.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (16)

    malcolmreyMay 31, 2023· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    well, I know which model I'm using for testing my latest samples tonight :-)

    LostAtSeaJun 7, 2023

    How was it?

    malcolmreyJun 7, 2023

    i've been a bit sick so i havent actually tested it only, downloaded, but during the next two days i will for sure try it

    also i will be uploading tomorrow morning some new stuff (as it is unlikely i will be able to do so today)

    malcolmreyJul 2, 2023

    @LostAtSea I'm currently using it as one of the models for current batch of new models so you will be able to see the result for yourself :)

    it is quite nice, i must say!

    EDGMay 31, 2023· 12 reactions
    CivitAI

    He did it, the madman

    johnsmitJun 1, 2023
    CivitAI

    same vae as dreamshapper?

    Lykon
    Author
    Jun 1, 2023

    Yeah

    somerandomguyJun 1, 2023

    @Lykon and what is it? I go to dreamshaper it's a checkpoint not a vae

    Lykon
    Author
    Jun 1, 2023

    @somerandomguy SD vae is baked in

    eye_am_boredJun 2, 2023· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    This works well but its one of those models that produces a lot of very similar faces for women, when i tried different ehtnicities they always ended up having similar-ish facial features, maybe the prompts fault im not sure

    Lykon
    Author
    Jun 2, 2023· 1 reaction

    Care to show some examples? I have shown a wide face variety with minimal effort in the examples. Maybe it's something in your pronpting style or settings. Make a post with a gallery and link it here ao I can pinpoint the issue.

    Also every SD model defaults to similar faces, but you make it sound like this is as bad as some other models that literally always make the exact same face.

    Finally, have you tried prompting celebrity names? Or hair colors? Or nationalities?

    AutomaticismJun 3, 2023· 1 reaction

    You should check your prompts. See some of my prompt packs for other examples as well. (I am having huge success getting a wide variety of ethnicities and looks using both AbsoluteReality and DreamShaper (both are similar) and both are created by Lykon)

    eye_am_boredJun 3, 2023

    @Lykon I agree I do think its an issue with SD in general, esspecially the upscaling process. Its so easy to lose individuality there. Often the images have a lot of uniqueness at 512 and seem to lose it along the way to high resolutions and the faces start to have same 'model' look. Even when I try to avoid prompting for excessively beautiful people.

    Thanks for the tips it most likely is an issue with my prompts, ill experiment and post something if i still have issues, thankyou for the info!

    eye_am_boredJun 3, 2023

    @Automaticism thankyou for the info! I partly think its my upscaling process, my prompts are okay, im being specific about which ehtinicies i want ect, but im always looking for ways to improve them so ill take a look!

    Lykon
    Author
    Jun 3, 2023

    @eye_am_bored are you using Latent upscaler by any chance? Try the one I suggested, it should reduce drastic changes between low and highres.

    eye_am_boredJun 3, 2023

    @Lykon thankyou, I havent heard of that one ill give it a go!