Get the pro version of my checkpoints and workflows. Get the Pro version of my models here.
Onsite generations are permanently available on these models:
👉 Realism_Illustrious_By_Stable_Yogi : https://civarchive.com/models/974693?modelVersionId=2091367
Read "About this version" Section for Model details and settings.
Important Usage Tips to get similar results like my images.
Add Realism_Illustrious_Negative_Embedding at the beginning of your negative prompt.
Add Realism_Illustrious_Positive_Embedding at the beginning of your prompt.
Loving this model? Get the Pro version of my models herefor exclusive perks and early access to unique resources.
To discuss custom Lora's or models, feel free to connect on Discord.
👍 Like this model to keep me motivated and inspired to create more!
💬 Drop a comment and let me know what you'd love to see next.
🌟 Review this model to help me improve and make even better creations.
🔔 Hit that notification bell to stay updated with my latest models and updates!
Description
Steps: 20+
Sampler: Euler a
CFG scale: 4+
Size: All SDXL Compatible Sizes
Negative Embedding: Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Negatives-neg
Positive Embedding: Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Positives
FAQ
Comments (15)
Thank you for this wonderful gift!
Thank you! You deserve it. 😊
i do want to try it. but there are loras I like that aren't made for that illustrious :(
Leave the links below for those Loras, if they are realistic Lora's, i will try to bring them sooner.
@Stable_Yogi 1 of them is mainly furry, but i do use it on realistic.
https://civitai.com/models/416526?modelVersionId=464072 <-furry
https://civitai.com/models/759257?modelVersionId=974244 <-prolapse lora
@xCraftx Sorry Man, this is out of my syllabus.
@Stable_Yogi ah, oh well. ty for looking & commenting. maybe some one will eventually.
@xCraftx Yeah, Someone will.
Thanks
I'm not used to Illustrious prompt, but even compared to the base model, it's too hard for me to get the expressions, pose and background details I want.
But the result gives actually realistic pictures, with rare hand errors even without embedding
Overtrained for realism, lost base model flexibility.
The background here is very pixelated and the girls are full of pimples, what can cause this? I'm pretty sure I followed the descriptions correctly.
Thanks for the feedback. Try the Version 1.1 and see the difference.
thanks, provides really good pictures. The tagging could be improved, it doesn't do the Illustrious justice. Use danbooru and rule34 tags for the images, it should be a good improvement.
Thanks for the feedback, will fix this in the next version.
@Stable_Yogi That's good to hear. Will be interesting to see how that plays out