Also available on mage.space.

people down-thumbing that just cause they asked if it was possible to make male focused images is hilarious, cause like, imagine the level of insecurity you must have.

@Nee_Vee_Noir It's not a statement, it's a reaction. You may not like it, but that doesn't change anything.

@6tZ Definitely the third one, yeah. I'm sadly used to it on here from people who haven't figured out their tags.

Like as a gay man myself, I see tits and vaginas constantly on this site and I never thumbs down or sad face emote them loool. Homophobes and insecure dudes gotta do what they gotta do, I suppose.

@Nee_Vee_Noir @6tZ You will never please or appease strangers who dislike you, and that shouldn't be your goal just as it's not mine. You could have let it be what it is and move on. But you didn't merely react, you decided to attack us "people down-thumbing", so you now get an actual non-representative statement from one of them. Enjoy.

You are owed exactly as much as I am owed, which is absolutely nothing, though one certainly doesn't help the case by accusing strangers with the same tired, worthless ad hominem slander that may have caused the negative reaction in the first place. Yeah, dudes are sick of your perpetual and divisive culture war, sick of being guilty without due process for a crime their accusers can't articulate or otherwise define, sick of the shameless gaslighting and hostility over nothing, sick of good folk being labeled terrible things by even more terrible people. Go ask, "Can this do women" on the gay male focused Checkpoints or LoRAs. You might find a similar negative reaction to that question on at least one or two of those models. To be clear, I'm not claiming it's prevalent at the moment, but I see that kind of reaction to normal, inoffensive things across websites all the time. I laugh and move on. But you didn't, and so I didn't, and here we are. I would hope that, if your neutral and unilateral standard is real and not mere virtue-signaling, that you admonish those reactions as well should you come across them. But I know you won't, because you haven't complained at all about the hearts. By your logic, imagine hearting the question. It is, by that reasoning, just as pointless and useless, since the thumbs supposedly represent interest or lack thereof. What does the heart mean in this context, then? Why did you yourselves heart it? Why is it valid but the thumbs-down is somehow not? No thought or concern was spared questioning that in particular because nobody on this website is free of bias and partisan rhetoric. You are not better than me, you are not more virtuous than me, you are not holier than me, and you are not above me. I didn't thumbs down to attack or target you or even the person asking, because nobody knows or cares that a self-proclaimed gay person on the internet exists, just like they don't know or care that I exist. The difference is that I tend to leave people be, whereas you seem to want and demand obedience and external validation at all times. That is at least part of the reason you attacked those like myself who thumbs-downed the question. That's part of the reason I'm wasting my precious little time writing all this shit when I just want to download a photorealistic checkpoint model and generate some butts. Perhaps on that last part we can agree.