Welcome to Perfection Realistic!
This is an Illustrious XL merge with a bunch of hand-selected checkpoints and LoRAs to improve the base model's realistic capabilites.
And wow, does it deliver!
Also available on mage.space.
It's focus is on creating high quality, photorealistic, but slightly exaggerated images with a focus on women.
Do not use the Normal scheduler. Use Simple or Beta!
Use euler_a, dpmpp_2m_sde or dpmpp_3m_sde as your sampler.
To use the faster low-step settings, you need to use the DMD2 LoRA. This allows you to use 8 or 16 steps and generate very fast. Remember to generate in 2 passes, either using "Hires fix" in Forge/A1111, or by creating and chaining a second sampler node in ComfyUI. A sample workflow if included in the sample images of the model. Use this as a reference.
Each sample/preview image contains the used workflow. Here's a quick article with simpler more beginner-friendly workflow. This is a recommended starting point.
Recommended Settings
Base Generation
Steps: 24
CFG-scale: 4
Sampler: DPM++ 3M SDE
Scheduler: Simple (beta upscale scheduler)
Upscale/Refine
Steps: 8
CFG-scale: 6
Sampler: DPM++ SDE (dpmpp_sde)
Scheduler: Beta
Denoise: 0.35
Description
FAQ
Comments (34)
I use this checkpoint for almost ALL the works that require realism, Some people say RealismSDXL is better, but no, this one is. Sacrifying a little bit of "cleaniness" for more accurate img2img generations
well i paid for the model and ask question and you don't answer but make it free the next day, great
"well i paid.." You should have waited for some hours
@qek its wasn't even at half, but i guess my bad
@Hothi Sorry, but the model automatically becomes free after somoe time, you need to look at the text where it says that the model is released in X days/hours.
I did not trigger any manual releasing for free.
It's just how CivitAI works.
@Hothi I didn't answer your question because I don't have an answer.
Your question is unanswerable. What do you mean "best"? Best for what?
Just try resolutions and see if you like the output?
If this is no good for you, look at the images from the model that you like, what resolution are they? Use those resolutions.
@6tZ you upscale your image don't you ? so the resolution of the image from the model aren't the real resolution, sooooooo i guess you use 768X1344 by the ratio and the upscale but why can't you just say the resolution you use and "Just try resolutions and see if you like the output" its not like a model is tranning on specific resolution, MY BAD, hard question to answer i guess
@Hothi It's SDXL-based, use standard SDXL resolutions. Omg rude people...
@GlowingGuardianGirl i hope its ragebating 🙏
@Hothi Yes, it's upscaling 2x. You'll find it in the workflows.
With the exception of perhaps the last version, since I had some workflow-saving issues at the time so it won't be included.
You'll find it in older images.
But to be honest, I don't worry about resolution, I just look at output, is it good or not. So I have no recommendations to give, which is why I left your original query unanswered, hoping maybe someone with more knowledge has anything to contribute :)
Regarding resolution and mentioning it: It would have taken me the same amount of time to figure out as it would you.
It's not like I have this in my mind or memory, it's something I configured years ago and I just keep running it. I know I'm 2x the final output in the end, and my outputs are ~1080p, so I just halve that or something. As I said, I'm not bothered by it.
Wow, this is the best checkpoint I've tried so far – and I've tried them ALL, in all possible settings and prompts. Unfortunately – and this is the only drawback – it can't handle Tgirls. Great work, thank you, keep it up. Perhaps you could include a few Tgirls in the next version. :)
What is a Tgirl? I'm too afraid to search the web sometimes...
@6tZ :D It might upset you, but don't judge on kinks. A woman with a penis.
@heinerheinervonvielen417 No judgement here :)
I'll see what I can do, I want to make sure that it doesn't interfere with other known anatomy, i.e. I don't want all women to turn into Tgirls. That would be a separate model.
Do you have any SDXL/Illustrious LoRAs of this subject to recommend?
@6tZ No, unfortunately not. All existing Loras alter the entire image and, in my opinion, only produce rubbish or oversized penises, the kind you only see in porn. Checkpoints that can at least basically conjure up penises on girls, and in some cases even quite well, are the SDXL models from StableYogi (Ultra_Realistic) or from epinikion. Or the Pony models from StableYogi (Realism) and gonzalomo (PhotoXL).
This checkpoint can generate good penises, but it cannot generate body shapes except for completely slim ones. https://civitai.com/models/667908/cocksxl-tgirls-and-males
Perhaps the checkpoint could be incorporated, or something like that? Unfortunately, I don't know anything about this. :D
@heinerheinervonvielen417 It could be incorporated via merging, so it's one I can take a look at. I just need to make sure it doesn't destroy penis-populated males or vagina-wielding women :)
@heinerheinervonvielen417 in reality they are men with tits xD, common just be honest :)
@pink0909 No, I see it differently. They are women with a bonus. I'm not talking about some hairy guys who put on a push-up bra and a wig. 😂
@heinerheinervonvielen417 so you mean the women which had sugery to install an addon (penis) i guess , but they are way less in quantity, but the majority are just guys with tits (Ladyboy is a more precise description).
@heinerheinervonvielen417
Regardless of which way the dick swings, I tried some with this today but not very successful.
It's not impossible, but not simple either.
I got it in there, but I need the model to unlearn so much, it is mostly left with hybrids. Vagenises or peginas. Not good results. If I blend in more of the suggested model, I lose too much of the perfection model.
You can try to do a merge with it yourself and see if you find something you like, but for now I've given up on it.
If you have a dataset, or can make/share one, I would consider training it into the model, but I don't have the time for the sidequest of making that right now :)
@6tZ @6tZ nah, please dont do it, civit ai is already spammed with "Tgirls" to the point it gets very anoying since it can not be filtered effectively. Most users just tag it as "women" too. There are plenty of Checkpoints aviable (especially pony versions) and the other option are loras. There is no need to refocus this checkpoint.
@pink0909 I don't think you should vote not to do something :)
Better to shut your mouth and do what makes you happy, right?
@6tZ well i didn't just "vote" i gave explicit arguments why. I also today saw your other models galleries where its clear they can do futa images. So there is no point in especially add this feature. You said you have limited time, i think you can take your own advice to heart, and i quote: "better Better to shut your mouth and do what makes you happy" (and save some time ;) while doing so. Anyway i dont know why you feeld attacked, and shutting up or recommending it, is not my style. I prefere discussions. :D
@pink0909 I don't think you telling someone else to not do something is productive. It's anti-productive. Let people do what they want instead of complaining about it.
As you say, it may not be what you or I prefer to spend our time doing, or maybe it is, who cares. Don't tell people what to do or not to do, it's not your job.
Please let my model comments be a safe space for people to express themselves without being attacked and silenced. It's how I want to be treated and how I treat others. If it's something you don't want, just close the tab.
@6tZ I couldn't have put it better myself, thank you. Some people obviously have a problem with other people's lifestyles and worlds. That's not necessarily a bad thing in itself; you don't have to like it. But condemning others because of it and dictating how they should live their lives is absolutely unacceptable.
@CupRunethOverWithLSD 100%
I don't think pink0909 meant anything bad by it. I'm sure they are a good person. It's just not helpful what they requested. It's much easier for them to drop out of the conversation.
@6tZ I see it differently. If he doesn't want to see it, he simply shouldn't prompt it, it's that simple. But he doesn't want it on principle, simply because he won't tolerate it.
@6tZ ok that was a much better answer than just telling a critic to shut up :) , that doesn't mean i agree, but now i understand what your Motive is. I just want to highlight, that I showed you how productive i was, by convincing you to use arguments :D . One logical flaw i might point out is "Don't tell people what to do or not to do, it's not your job" it can be used by the counterparty right away like an Uno-Reversecard. Arguing gets better with time, the more you practice. Since i dont want to annoy you , Lets close this Topic and move on.
@pink0909 All good friend :)
I realized the hypocricy/humor in me telling you what to do while telling you what to do ;)
@pink0909 The whole discussion is complete bullshit. Why do you care what a model can and cannot represent? It's not like suddenly only dicks are coming out of the generator.
But to defuse the whole thing: I built myself a model, based on Chroma, which can now do all of this. If you're interested, feel free to check it out. It's in my profile.
@6tZ Thanks for all your hard work!
@CupRunethOverWithLSD sorry topic is already closed ;), for your question its already answered in my first and second reply. Best Regards
@pink0909 I don't want to discuss this any further. It's obvious that you don't accept other ways of life, worldviews, and sexual preferences. Have a nice life in your matchbox world! ;)
@CupRunethOverWithLSD while saying you dont want to discuss further, you add another open topic. I cant accept your accusations they are wrong and you just project you typical Worldview on me. Nothing of that is true, if you read my comment correctly without bias you would understand i was just annoyed by being forced to watch this unproportionally posted stuff (unproportional when you compare it to the general public), because there are 2 issues: 1 civitsai's filter system is broken i can try filter all day long i still get to see these images. 2. The community you are comming from (i guess, i mean the T"girl",Futanari,G-Furries and so on folks) also have the annoying habbit to get a kick of forcing people to watch their stuff by not labeling it correctly , for example claiming its a women or girl. This behavior is very common, even when i shop on aliexpress these folks get a kick out of posting their sefies in the Womens category. So it has nothing to to with not being tolerant, but more to be annoyed of this behavior. Just replace Tgirl with something you find annoying and you are forced to watch it on every website you go, then maybe you will understand at somepoint you will run out of "tollerance" ;D since its just abbrasive in the longterm. Best Regards.
Details
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.