Regards for all your love and support ❤
avoiding negatives can improve result on SDXL
Description
tried to push prompt adherence and realism
FAQ
Comments (13)
I'm using workflow from example images and I got garbage... Strange.
Me too same...
I rarely comment but I just tested it and... WOW. It does understand my prompt (did not use any negative this time, zero) and it gets it to the mark every time. CFG really changes composition, not the entire prompt like I suffer with other models, very nice. Stepping needs to be high to get great detailed results but they're very worth it; lower steps won't change the image all together, great to work with previews. Spectacular model <3
Thank you mate!
GREAT Checkpoint! The best SDXL Model, work very well with Forge.
VXVII is not a valid roman numeral
V18 when?~ V16 us my favorite.
UUuuuuuu new model!
Can't wait to try Pure out.... and Welcome back ^_^
Welcome back Epic 🌹. Love your models. Am I mistaken to think this model suffers from bad hands?





