Join The Tinkerer on Whop to get early releases, private pages, and the Tinkerer Discord role - all in one place. 👉 Join on Whop
CyberRealistic is a flexible, easy-to-use photorealistic model built from nonstop testing, custom blends, and just the right amount of chaos. The backstory? It’s honestly a wild mashup of different checkpoints, but what really counts is what you get in the end: sharp, expressive, clean renders that just work.
It’s tuned for both textual inversion and LoRA, so it’s great for anyone from total beginners to hardcore prompt wizards. If you’re making portraits, messing around with new styles, or just want a model that steps aside and does its job, CyberRealistic won’t let you down.
⚙️ Suggested Settings
Sampling method: DPM++ SDE Karras / DPM++ 2M Karras
VAE: is already Baked In
Sampling steps: 30 Steps
Resolution: 512x768
CFG: 5
Upscale: 2x
Upscaler: 4x_NickelbackFS_72000_G
Denoising strength: 0.3🧠 Prompting
Negative prompt examples
lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry💾 Backup & Resources
backup location: huggingface
☕ Support the Project
If this model helped you hit your vision faster, cleaner, or just plain better — consider [buying me a coffee]. It keeps the updates coming and the experiments wild.
💡 Need Better Prompts?
This custom ChatGPT was made to top-tier prompts just for this model:
🔗 [Try it now on ChatGPT]
⚠️ Friendly Warning
This model can generate mature content. Use responsibly. Respect laws, platforms, and people.
Description
Please visit this page for the latest Beta versions
This version combines all the positive aspects of the previous versions.
Skin improvements
Better "NSFW"
Cute connoisseurs will love it ;)
minor other improvements/changes
I didn't put a lot of time in the generated images. If you provide compelling and detailed prompts, the model can generate better images :)
FAQ
Comments (12)
Apology for my idiot question but what's the use of the "inpainting" model ? what's the difference comparing to the generic 2.1 version ?
Inpainting refers to the process of filling in missing or corrupted parts of an image. It uses a different model.
@Cyberdelia from a technical standpoint, what difference is it to use the regular model for inpainting, vs the inpainting model for inpainting? Is an inpainting model optimized for recognition of objects in the input image?
@breuddwydiwr It outpaints much better. Better coherency with the base picture. quote "The inpainting model has an extra option for inpainting where you can adjust how much you want the composition/shape to change on a scale of 0-1. It's called something like Conditional Mask Strength. Not to be confused with denoising strength."
@gurukast Does that mean I should use the original model for generating the starter image, and then switch over to the inpainting model for the inpainting portion? I apologize for the stupid question!
3.0beta is a superb evolution.
The bad mouth issue is much more lesser. (i added a post with unchanged prompt-set, only checkpoint changed).
If allowed, two things:
Together with a "special pose instruction Lora" it is in compare to the v2.1 a little ignorish. It produces often / more face portraits than the 2.1 version. May you can check to compare, may its a problem of the Lora(s). (i higher-ed the weight, that helps sometimes.)
If driven in higher cfg rates it gets for my taste one-two ticks to saturated (without any vae-s). May there is some "space" for a little lesser..
Great model .. Thumb up smiley.
Thank you once again for your comment! It is highly appreciated.
You might be able to remedy some of that posing issue with controlnet or higher prompt weights
A really great model.
Where can we find these embeddings referenced in the prompts ?
cyber_negative_p1
cyber_negative_p2
cyber_negative_p3
logically this is not released and it is the model creator's personal embeddings test
@s6yx @ritcher1 Apologies for my delayed response. These are negative prompts that I've renamed or combined, such as "badhands" and "easynegative." They're nothing out of the ordinary. In the future, I'll make sure to use more typical negative prompts to avoid any confusion.
@Cyberdelia Ok, thanks for the reply.