Welcome to epiCPhotoGasm
This Model is highly tuned for Photorealism with the tiniest amount of exessive prompting needed to shine.
All Showcase images are generated without Negatives (V1) to show what is possible on the bare prompt.
Whats special?
The model has highly knowledge of what a photo is, so if u promt u can avoid using photo. If the prompt tends to be fantasy like the model will turn away from photo and u have to tweak by prompting and/or negatives.
The model can do various ethnicities well, so try them out.
Age is also well trained and known by the model, so try them out too.

How to use
use simple prompts without "fake" enhancers like "masterpiece, photorealistic, 4k, 8k, super realistic, realism" etc.
don't use a ton of negative embeddings, focus on few tokens or single embeddings
you can still use atmospheric enhances like "cinematic, dark, moody light" etc.
start sampling at 20 Steps
no extra noise-offset needed
Additional Ressources
Style Negatives: colorful Photo | soft Photo
Useful Extensions
!After Detailer | ControlNet | Agent Scheduler | Ultimate SD Upscale
⭐ Feel free to leave Reviews and Samples - and always have fun creating ❤
Description
Private Model Release
This is my finetuned private Model which is based on the Z Model with a merge of finetuned Photo Lora to improve photorealistic outcomes, dont expect too much change to the Z Version
This is finally the last model update to come i swear
FAQ
Comments (65)
@epinikion I know I is unimportant, but I'm just curious? Should I try the new model out or just Stick with Z? If I try it out, I'll post a few images with mixed faces to show off the Checkpoint's ability to create unique new characters.
Go for it. I always love to see what others do come up with since I have probably other test settings I focus on.
You don't understand the joy seeing "i swear" brought. I don't want the Epi era to ever end! >:(
Probably, we will see. I tried finetuning XL a few times, but gosh is that annoying, the speed, the size, the outcome… But I think 1.5 is at the peak now.
@epinikion agree that, many people at the crossroads and hesitate, so many factors, especially the cost of time and hardware
@epinikion Guess what, there's apparently a 1.6 now, so... the peak just got higher!
@Aptronym Yes. SDXL is still in its infancy so what epi might be saying could be SD 1.6? I still use 1.5 but I refuse to update since i like the results i get already. Plus everything just works on 1.5. A man once said: If it broke don't fix it, but i do want to try SDXL/new samplers lol
@epinikion I've seen no need to move over to SDXL when 1.5 can get this good with a quarter of the size. I understand this model may be at the peak, but I meant your era of any other work/model you may have in the back burner or thinking about in general (concepts maybe? hmmm)
Of course, don't burn out for internet strangers, but we do enjoy your work and look forward to it if there's more to come in any other form aside this model :)
"This is finally the last model update to come"
Does that mean it won't be rebased on SD 1.6?
Will it ever see the public light?
@epinikion It is available on the Stability AI API page so I would expect the actual model to come out soon.
https://platform.stability.ai/pricing
@OggoJ I don‘t think so but I would love to see
My absolutely favourite model! Do you plan to release something different since you finished this one?
Thank you! Nothing planned.
May I ask if this bottom mold is suitable for real people in Asia?
i swear 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Great model, I love it. Any plans for SDXL?
What does "Last Unicorn" mean? How is it different from other models?
Check about section and see sample pics or try it out yourself
It's probably reference to unicorn dream from classic bladerunner
@SharpArrow Not sure if you're making a joke 😄 but I'm pretty sure it's a reference to the book and/or movie "The Last Unicorn" which are about the last unicorn in the world. Implying that this may be the last iteration of this SD1.5 model. 🥲
@epzer or it implies he's gae
Do we need any specific SD VAE for this model?
Same question
vae-ft-mse-840000-ema-pruned
@nrofis Thanks
Will there be an SDXL version of this?
". . . dont expect too much change to the Z Version"
Except that Last Unicorn does hands and feet 100x better than Z or Y. I love every variation of epicphotogasm, but those appendages are a real pain, until now. Even if they're messed up, inpainting with the unicorn can actually fix them. This is probably the best model I've ever used. Bravo.
Next version should be called "The Unicorn Afterparty"
Your work is just awesome ❤
If you don't mind, I'd like to make a suggestion on what else to improve. Well it's NSFW capabilities, specifically - genitals. They are quite decent already, but not as good as i like them to see, especialy when it comes to sexual itercourse.
For reference this checkpoint quite better at this: https://civitai.com/models/198256/realhotspice
I would love to see same level of anatomically correct genitals in yours.
这个模型让我想起了Juggernaut,很难指望哪个版本是最后的→ _ →,总得下一个删一个
Not your fault. But what is it with SD and feet? Yes it has a problem with hands but feet seem to be much worse. I wish there was a solution on the horizon.
You can try the Negfeet negative embedding https://civitai.com/models/90707/negfeet-improve-feet-quality but the success rate is quite low from a quick test run.
this is one of the best checkpoints to use when i'm drunk or high because it does not requirers too many prompts. Spectacular!!
I tried all FUTA and TGirl loras, but they do not work well with this excellent model.
Any chance you could include or train Shemales?
wtf dude lol
@Asbarka13 hey man, whatever floats your boat.
😁
I get decent results combining my FAPP lora https://civitai.com/models/129350?modelVersionId=146638 with Tgirls_V4. Set both to 0.3-0.5
Can someone pleaae tell me the difference between epicphotogasm_X, XPlus, Xplusplus, and XPhotoreal? The model file i downloaded a few months ago is just epicphotogasm_x.safetensors now im confused by the variants
Agree. Join the club - it's a bit confusing :) Version numbers are clearer I think. They all pretty much do the same thing very well, it seems. Happy to be corrected (politely).
I'm using LastUnicorn now and it's great. Someone commented it does hands and feet better - haven't got the time to properly test all the model variants so not 100% sure. Brilliant models but a bit more explanation would really help :)
it sais right there when you click ''about this version'' under the model info.
And what the difference between X and Y ?
@sevilleianproduc2250 Hands are really good indeed! Eyes are hit or miss though
You can use Photoshop Generative AI to fix hands. Use the lasso tool, select a hand. In the "Generate" field, type "fix hand.".... voila.
*I might add, it may take a few tries to get it right.
@EryxAtys thanks mate, do you have more little tipps like these?
@EryxAtys True, I'll do that. thanks.
Universal Z and Last Unicorn are the best all around sd 1.5 models created. I spend a lot of time experimenting with merging models and training loras to just compare it to the sheer range of this model. I feel like I might as well give up because this model can already do the concepts that I’m training for but it does it better. AMAZING. Would love to know what your process is.
this model is so cool
Makes a great refiner for XL models as well!
Is it important to have many sampling steps when using refiner?
@goodly666521 No actually, I believe if you are using it as a refiner for XL just use 4 steps for 1.5. And use standard Refiner for SDXL.
Humm. I gave up on SDXL because it just doesn't do NSFW realistic like 1.5 does. Maybe I'll give it a try again. Can you provide more details? what base model would be good to use? I have some good results of SFW images using Model: nightvisionXLPhotorealisticPortrait as a base SDXL with Refiner: realisticStockPhoto_v10, Refiner switch at: 0.1, Steps: 40, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 5, ADetailer model: mediapipe_face_full, ...but still cannot get a decent nipple to for the love of god!
@djwashout If you want anything special like nipples or weird looks like dissolving people or ink styles, you'll wanna go with a LoRA, which are awesome I've come to find... just recently in fact. As far as refiner, I should have been more specific that I didn't know about at the time. I believe it may be a Fooocus exclusive feature where you'll drop the 1.5 refiner to .4, and it'll really help. I'm not quite sure if it's a help in A1111 or Comfy, as I don't really use refiners in those, considering I use them for more experimental purposes. Testing the new stuff, for example. For the record, I'm awful with Comfy. Best of luck in getting your quality images.
How come all the prompts are gone?
Please make a XL version
This model is very good, follows framing and lighting prompts quite well, and also other instructions. The problems are a bit with eyes symmetry, strabismus and also breasts.
What CFG scale do you find to generate the most realistic results? I'm currently using 3 and it seems to produce rather realistic backgrounds.
I normally use 5 with this model.
why when i copy prompt and seed the photos look much different and they are ugly
Plase help me my discord: Mateusz🐧#0552
Hi, Im new in SD, but I also faced a lot of issues with quality. If you hape problems with faces then you shoud enable After Detailer (ADetailer section), it is "must have", especiaaly for full body shots. Also pay attentinon to Clip Skip setting, it is 1 by default but i see that usually it shoud be 2. It could be found it global settings in Automatic 1111. Also people use upscalers before posting something to public, nobody posts 512px blurry images. Upscalers may have signnificant impact and change the image look, it depends on upscaler settings and type. Just google this things, there are some short youtube tutorials for every thing I mentioned.
Can the newer models create the same as older model versions?
Is is possible to download the unpruned version of lastunicorn somewhere? I would like to use it for ultraupscale. Thanks!
Great model, but for some reason the unicorn model ignores prompts for body shape when the camera is from behind and it can be hard to get consistent body types. I've had good results with universal!
Details
Files
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
Mirrors
epiCPhotoGasm.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
tempModel01Formal_v10.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
epicphotogasm_lastUnicorn.safetensors
diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.











