
Join The Tinkerer on Whop to download this model and many more — all for one monthly payment. Plus, get early releases, private tools and a lot more. 👉 Join on Whop
CyberRealistic Pony blends all the charm of Pony Diffusion with the striking realism of CyberRealistic. The vibe? You get everything from adorable to bold (sometimes both at once) with crazy-detailed textures, moody cinematic lighting, and a hint of AI flair.
🧠 How to Use It
Sampling method: DPM++ SDE Karras / DPM++ 2M Karras / Euler a
Sampling steps: 30+ Steps
Resolution: 896x1152 / 832x1216
CFG: 5
Clip Skip: 2✅ Recommended Prompts
score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, (SUBJECT), Negative Prompt examples:
score_6, score_5, score_4, (worst quality:1.2), (low quality:1.2), (normal quality:1.2), lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, signature, watermarks, ugly, imperfect eyes, skewed eyes, unnatural face, unnatural body, error, extra limb, missing limbsit's also possible to remove the normal pony tags:
(SUBJECT), Negative Prompt examples:
(worst quality:1.2), (low quality:1.2), (normal quality:1.2), lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, signature, watermarks, ugly, imperfect eyes, skewed eyes, unnatural face, unnatural body, error, extra limb, missing limbs🛠 ADetailer Settings
Adetailer model: face_yolov9c.pt
If you only want the main face being refined set 'Mask only the top k largest' to 1.☕ Support
Enjoying the ride? [Buy me a coffee] – but only if the Pony delivered something you actually like.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This model might generate sensitive content. Whatever you make with it is on you. Don’t do anything weird and try to blame the horse.
🔗 Links
Backup location: huggingface
💡 Need Better Prompts?
This custom ChatGPT was made to whip up top-tier prompts just for this model:
🔗 [Try it now on ChatGPT]
Description
This CyberRealistic Pony version has been completely revamped. The differences between versions 6.4 and 6.5 are substantial. Some areas have improved, while others might be less ideal (though I haven't noticed any issues yet).
No need to include tags for score_9, score_8_up, or score_7_up in the positive prompt, nor score_6, score_5, or score_4 in the negative prompt. Refer to the pinned images for examples.
FAQ
Comments (84)
6.4-6.5 Another new version so quickly?
You noticed that correctly! :) The reason for releasing a new checkpoint version so quickly is because I’ve been working on multiple things simultaneously. Version 6.4 was already finished a while ago, and I had already started working on 6.5. I could wait and put 6.5 behind early access, but I’ve decided to just release it.
My updates are not always essential to download. If you’re happy with 6.4, there’s no need to switch to 6.5 just for me. Meanwhile, I’m working on some 1.5 and XL versions and the Semi Realistic Pony project. This kind of craziness happens when you spend an average of 6 hours a day on the technical aspects (and yes, I also have a busy job). I’ll rest when I’m not around anymore! :)
6.5 😍
Why the downvotes? Because he's excited about a new version? Or is it because I release my checkpoints too quickly? Either way, don’t worry about the downvotes—I'm just glad you're happy!
6.5 is pretty good 🔥
Model works well with Hyper 8step LoRA at CFG:1, 8 steps and Eular A SGM Uniform.
Do those hyper loras work in hi-res fix too?
@arnorwing Yes, works great.
Thanks for the tip, after tweaking the settings here and there a bit, it works like a charm without any drawbacks in quality but ways faster, great for testing prompts 😃👍
Nice work, the 6.5 is better than 6.3 and 6.4 :)
I'm still testing all three, but think I like v6.3 better than v6.4 and v6.5 so far (and v6.4 better than v6.5).
Image quality seems to improve slightly with each of those versions, but prompt/LoRA adherence and expected results gets a little worse with each revision. Still all great models, though.
To date I have tried a total of 147 versions of different models. I applaud loudly. This is my favorite model. And a big bow to the master.
Thank you... (only 147 ;) )
Few tech questions, if you don't mind:
1. Is VAE baked in?
2. What sampler is the best to use?
3. Any recommendations on CFG scale?
VAE baked in.
Sampler: Euler a or DPM++ SDE, DPM2 a (you need to experiment)
CFG Scale: 6/7
@Cyberdelia Thank you, sir!
looking forward to 6.6 next week.
LOL! I do enjoy this kind of sarcasm :) I can appreciate it.
In my opinion, this is one of the best checkpoints ever created. Phenomenal. Keep it going!
6.5 - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
The best, most realistic, effortlessly amazing Pony checkpoint I've used so far. Seriously, the aesthetic and quality of generation results absolutely blows everything else out of the water to date. Both the subject and the backgrounds are very well done. And the results I achieved didn't even need lora's to further guide/refine them, though they can still help for niche uses such as posing.
what's your secret to being the best of the best model creator ?! :wow:
The secret is that you invest an average of 4-6 hours every day in development and don't mind not getting anything financial in return. Having ADHD and the ability to hyperfocus certainly helps too.
Some people go to therapy; I have this.
Is there a chance we could get the official negative embedding for this model? When it comes to SD 1.5, we've got a stunning CyberRealistic_Negative_v3 that does all of it, would be awesome to have similar stuff for Pony.
Great work!
Couldn't decide between this and the new magic checkpoint so I merged both and haven't looked back. Wonder how long before pony will plateau?
How do you merge Magic and Cyberrealisitc? I'm new to stable diffusion and have also been using both Magic and Cyber. I prefer magic for most things but cyber seems to do better photorealistic eyes. does merging get the best of both worlds?
@AI_captain Theres a checkpoint merger in SD, but honestly go to chat gpt and ask "how do you merge checkpoints in stable diffusion" and it gives a really detailed tutorial lol.
Best checkpoint.
2m Karras is still king. You can achive the most realistic result with that.
6.5 just beat 6.2 for me. Until then, 6.2 was the best from my point of view.
awsome
Hi Cyberdelia!
What your negative embedding does contain exatly? What prompts?
I have very little difference with it.
where's version 3, 4, 5???
From all posts of other people version 6.4 looks not realistic at all (plastic/3D/CG like). Or is it because its pony?
Yeah that's usually what images look like when people don't know what they are doing and just use the onsite generator at 25 steps. 99% of the pictures you see posted on here are garbage. 6.4 is the best version of this checkpoint with 6.5 being a downgrade imo.
@AlleyCa7 Could you explain more, why 6.4 is the best for you. I tried all of them, and 6.5 has the clearest eyes out of stock. Without adetailer, hires. Practically i dont need adetailer, i only use hires rarely.
I love using this, but there are times where I get this odd grey box outside the bounding box area when I do this, saw it on a few images here. Once that gets fixed totally this will easily be my favorite checkpoint on this page. Even with the error it's one of my favorite checkpoints. Great work, just wish that box thing wouldn't happen.
Best realistic model so far at least with your embedding :), do you have a koyha ss lora training config?
everything seems to be fine, details, understanding of description and so on, but the face is a complete disaster, if you don’t use an additional tool to improve the quality of the image with a fixation on the face... it feels like it was done on purpose from the start!
I have exact opposite experience. Its fuckin good out of stock, i dont need adetailer, and barely use hires.
I have ultraclear eyes, that is, what matters, isnt it?
Those old quality prompts still work. (8k, ultra highres), i use these prompts too: p1g30n, 1g0r, s1_dram. These nonsense words give ultrasharp, clear result. And you can use: amateur, raw, photorealistic, real life, photo
Edit: use 2m Karras, 6cfg, 30steps, for best realism.
What i love in Cyberrealistic is the balance.
There are way more realistic models, but at the training session all of them are lost the compability, roots with the base model. I specifically mean character, celeb lora likeness.
Cyberdelia keeps pushing forward, while keeps the "backward compability".
And i suspect a huge step forward to realism in the 7.x versions.
Mark my words, there will be a version, which supersede any other checkpoint. It happened in SD1.5, SDXL almost there, and it will happen on the pony fields too.
Then you were lucky. I have a generation that has completely different eyes between 6.3 and 6.5. Granted it is a "cowboy" shot, so zoomed out, but with stable seed it should reproduce a similar result, so I have to assume that the changes were too big since the background was completely and the pose was slightly changed.
@Raininosi Yes, for me 6.5 has the best eyes. I use oldschool quality tags, proper negative, and the eyes are crispy clear. I dont need adetailer, and i am thinking to drop hires too. A simple upscaler enough(i use Topaz Gigapixel. In Topaz simple upscaling is 3 second, hires for me about 1.5 minutes).
so good
I tought every realistic Pony checpoint could do porn. I was wrong. Only around 30% of them can do constant hardcore.
Cyber can do 10/10 batch constant hardcore, while others fail miserably.
This is just a side note. I praised Cyber enough on other accounts.
Hey Cyberdelia!
Question. Do you only train from Pony v6, or add from SDXL? Because, the hybrid realistic Pony merges have too much flaws. Prompt adherence mainly, harcore capability secondly.
For me CyberPony seems pure Pony(only dedicated danbooru tags work for example). I tried usual words, like sexy, attractive, beautiful, gorgeous, and they dont work, as IT HAS TO BE. Only booru tags work. Very good and this brings back to my question.
example prompts? I have no issues creating hc
Probably the one of the best models out right now. This has given me consistent goof results.
I'm pretty new on this, maybe this is a stupid question but when a model update is released we can delete the old one?
No, it’s definitely not a stupid question. You can delete the older model if you prefer, but it might be worth keeping.
Sometimes, older models behave differently and can even produce better results for certain types of images. Newer doesn’t always mean better, which is why you’ll often see one user favoring the latest version while another prefers an older one.
Try both models to see which one works best for you—or keep them both if you find value in each.
@Cyberdelia Thanks for the answer, It’s really helpful to know that it’s not unusual to keep older models around. I think I'll try both to see which one gives me the best results in different cases. Having more options to choose from depending on my needs sounds great. Thanks again!
Never. Always save the old models. You never know when it might get taken down because of censorship.
Also sometimes older models will produce something different than the current model.
I am now settled at 6.5, and cant find better option.
My body is ready for V7.x. I have high hopes. More realism, while keeping the balance.
Valliant Stallion, Virile Stallion are best at photorealism, but struggle at hardcore.
this is the last of all the realistic pony models i've tried and i'm so disappointed with myself for not using this one sooner. it's great
Its the most balaced realistic model. Its full blood Pony, everything works, what works in PonyV6.
You wont find any better, because they lack in various territory.
Of literally over two dozen NSFW potential models I tested, consisting of several hundred images generated across SDXL, Pony, and Flux models, this is the single best model in terms of adherence to prompt, realistic image quality, and consistency, without the use of any inpainting that I have found so far. The closest competitors are Pornmaster Pro and Realism by StableYogi. Other Pony models and every non-Pony model (SDXL and Flux) could not even generate a single image with my parameters (two distinct characters engaging in a sexual act).
Really hope to see this model improve even more in realistic quality.
What is your prompt for 2 distinct characters? They must be equally detailed. Asking for good sex scenes.
please provide more details. what other realistic pony models have you tried?
@isr431 I already mentioned 3, did you not read my comment fully? If you understood that it beat those two, then the other models should be irrelevant. But, every models I've tried include: AnterosXXXL, BigASP, bigLust, cyberrealistic(Pony and SDXL variants), EpicRealism, GoddessofRealism(Pony), JuggernautXL, Lustify, PonyRealism(Pony), PornMasterPro(Pony), Realism byStableYogi(Pony and SDXL variants), Realism Engine, RealVisXL, SDXXXL, Uber Realistic Porn Merge (Pony/SDXL hybrid). These models include every model that's specifically oriented for photorealism and/or NSFW. Of them, bigASP/bigLust/Lustify are cited on Reddit as the absolute best photorealistic models, but to me, the prompt adherence of Pony realistic models beats out everything. As such, all Pony models supercede non-Pony, that's why I didn't list them each. Of all the ones the Pony NSFW that were marketed for photorealism, it goes CyberRealistic > Yogi > PornMasterPro > PonyRealism >> other pony models >> SDXL/Flux models. (In terms of both exact prompt adherence for 2 people overall and photorealism for Pony models. Realism itself may be beaten, but not enough for it to make using non-Pony models worth it, unless you inpaint. But I was referring to 100% raw txt2img one model.) It was hard picking a winner, but cyber wins in terms of consistency and reliable quality potental from all my testing,
@parleyelder342 They aren't equally detailed in many cases. You may have to overemphasize the "harder" character to get, whether it's dispreffered by the model in terms of age (old or young in particular), gender (male), feature/position/action, etc. A vanilla, adult, female, is so generic that you can get away with no parentheses. While harder to generate characters often need upwards of 4-5 sets of (), lots of negative prompts, multiple synonyms, etc. My skeleton is basically like: person 1 having sex with person 2 in X position, descriptor1, descriptor2, descriptor3... where descriptor is a one word or few word phrase about either character or the setup/position. Mainly using as generic words as possible in danbooru tags style. Also don't forget to lead with score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up and negative score_3, score_4, score_5, score_6, etc. Missionary and doggy are pretty easy, as is handjob/blowjob. What are you looking for specifically? DM or reply me of what you want and I can give you examples.
@ygmdir Am not OP but advice would be appreciated,
Main features I'm after are male x female, both bodies in full view (preferably both faces too), not POV, not looking at viewer, visible penetration, bonus points for anal pen that doesn't look iffy (bonus bonus points if any idea how to actually make this less 'realistic' looking while still appealing, ie if this is a 1 in realism and the OPs semi-real Checkpoint is a 0.5 I'm after like a 0.75 if possible).
I've hardly touched realistic-style models yet (thanks for the breakdown confirming this one does indeed make the others pretty much irrelevant) but vs just Pony V6 with a couple style LORAs etc. am struggling a lot more with making decent sex scenes featuring the above.
@onelongwinter0451859 It's not that hard folks... Example of a positive prompt: score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, naked man and woman having sex, missionary, penetration, side view, whole body, photorealistic, beautiful eyes, beautiful smile. Negative prompt: score_1, score_2, score_3, score_4. The prompts "side view" and "whole body" and optional negative prompts like "out of frame" emphasize a side view missionary. You can also experiment by combining tags like "side view missionary." Alternatively, you can go full danbooru and do something like "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, male, female, missionary, sex, naked, side view, whole body, photorealistic, penetration, beautiful eyes, beautiful smile." Using this particular method I get images with very high quality and reliability. I usually do 20 steps normal + 15 hi-res steps @ 0.55-0.65. Get creative... It's not hard to get exactly what you want. See here for examples https://civitai.com/posts/9827803?returnUrl=%2Fmodels%2F443821%2Fcyberrealistic-pony
V7 for Christmas? Not Ponydiffusion.
First of all, I still have two amazing (if I may say so myself) Semi-Realistic Pony models. I’m not sure if I’ll release both of them. And I’m working on a new version, but whether it will be ready before Christmas? Who knows!
For me at least, after testing I believe using the scores in POS and NEG is better than No Positive Score+The Negative addon. With the later combo, less natural colors and lighting among other things.
Yes - I came also now to this conclusion. You can remove it but it's more consistent
same here, I think using the scores is still better on generating realistic image.
I needed a model to push the images I was working on toward photo and realism. I found CyberRealistic Pony and it pulled the images out of anime and cartoon into the photo style I wanted.
Really cool but anyone got any ideas or LORAs recommends to make outputs actually less real and more stylized across the image? Most style LORAs don't seem to work well with this (which makes sense) or just affect faces.
Why dont you choose a semireal model?
Noice!
No but seriously, solid generation in a benchmark that I use to check the models. Not a single image of the 40 that I generated had any deformations.
Keep up the great work!
what happened to v4 ?
this one is soo gooddd..will there be more updates :D
Yes
Awesome model, running it for over 3 months now. I need a suggestion or advice regardint upscaling in comfyui... anyone?
you want either a xinsir controlnet guided upscale with an upscaler of your choice or, if you can run it, flux, which is hard to beat but needs a lora as soon as naughty bits are involved. it is a long winded topic tho. noise injection is really helpful as well.
@jmueller thank you for the info, i will look into it.
Mate i would literally pay for a 1 hour tutorial with you on how to get the absolute best out of this amazing model - hit me up!
Hi Cyberdelia! I dont want to disturb you in the progress, but to V7 version could you add some western style swimsuit data? Pony can do only japanese style clothes, and there is not a single one-piece swimsuit lora, which is not kamikaze style. I mean about good old Baywatch style swimsuits. Those are not thin straps, racerback ones, just plain sexy swimsuits.
Thank you.
Seems Pony realism cant ascend further.
For months there are only hybrid XL Pony merges, which are not better, than 6.5, or better at realism for the cost of sacrificing booru tags, Pony language.
Top creators dont do shit, anyway top reaslistic ones not even that realistic.
I have patience, but i want a clearly better option, than 6.5. Say, V7 will be good.
Answer for us!:)
that's a lot of complaining for things you get for free without any effort
I am utterly amazed every day by what this technology can do, and it is not even 5 years old yet. Just wait, and be patient, because I've seen so much improvement since I started using generative AI, and I cannot wait to see what it will do next.
Eh. Just do img2img 0.4 strength with a good XL model when you are done and there you go.
We, GloberTrotzer, proclaim this model... outstanding!
Details
Files
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
Mirrors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
CyberRealisticPony_V65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65((2,249 positive reviews)).safetensors
CyberRealisticPony_V65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
CyberRealisticPony_V65.safetensors
CyberRealisticPony_V65.safetensors
cyberrealisticPony_v65.safetensors
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.









