DreamShaper - V∞!

add name / race / location

PROMPT.

If you don't say what you want or don't want, you'll get always the same.

My answer:
Depends on what you're looking for.

If you're still wanting 1.5, pick up 8.

If you want SDXL - go for SDXL <3

@duskfallcrew but I mean, does SDXL model make good images according to the prompts you tell it or is it still too early and should I continue with model 8 until they improve it? Thanks for answering me and sorry for my english xd

@ChocoboyMLG No you're fine but it's the same answer, see the pics in each model and see what's your preference

If you dont have at least 12GB of ram on your graphics card you may have trouble with sdxl based stuff. I have 5GB on mine (low I know) and i cant use sdxl with out getting out of memory errors.

For me (my use case) SDXL is better because it has many artists styles, so I can achieve stylistic results without controlnet. For art is amazing, for realistic portraits maybe 1.5 checkpoints still wins.

Try copying the generation data from one of the images other uses have posted. As an example, here's one of the top images:
https://civitai.com/images/1787093?period=AllTime&periodMode=published&sort=Most+Reactions&view=categories&modelVersionId=128713&modelId=4384&postId=444009

If you look towards the bottom of the sidebar on that image, you'll find the prompt and negative prompt* used to generate it, along with the steps, CFG scale, sampler, etc. Copy all of that and run it. Do you get a similar image?

I did it myself, even using a different version of Dreamshaper, and got several very similar images.

*The negative prompt in this case is just the EasyNegative embedding. I'd recommend getting it. But a good, general negative prompt you can use for everything is simply "(worst quality, low quality:1.4)". Remove the quotes, keep the parenthesis.

@hcommand68990 Thanks for the reply. I found out that there was something wierd with the loaded checkpoints, I reinstalled them and restarted and everything was fine.
Thanks anyway!

Also a noob (not used SD as much yet). But when this happened to me, I had forgotten to install and use a VAE. Just FYI for another time.

EDIT:Unless the VAE is baked in I guess.

I think it depends on the version. if the version doesn't have a baked VAE version then it doesn't need it. If the version has backed VAE version preferably get backed VAE version.

if there is a resolution problem in all the generated images, a VAE may be missing

use the VAE: https://huggingface.co/madebyollin/sdxl-vae-fp16-fix

Rule of thumb for any model/checkpoint without VAE. Get the most stable generic VAE from huggingspace most people recommend vae_ft_mse_840000_f16.ckpt

Put breasts in the negative prompts with a low weight. Some models will see "breasts" in the prompt and ignore anything else.

I guess it is easier to like big boobs

I use (flat chest:1.2)

@Badjak Thank you for your reply. I've tried that, and I still wind up with big boobs in my images.

@Fllamber I assume that's what all the models are trained on. :/ Which sucks because I could train my own model but then I'd have to learn how.

@sneky_snek I have "small breasts, medium breasts, large breasts" in the negative and "tiny breasts" in the prompt. Still, no dice. It's frustrating!

@mjranum150 Check my profile. I just uploaded some test data, which may be useful for you.

@Badjak Will do, thanks!

@mjranum150 I find that this model does very well at cute little "flat chest" characters. But it may only do it if you're referring to a younger girl. One thing that can be a factor is if you're working from a piece you like and want to change a little bit so your recycling the seed as your changing prompts it's possible that you're fighting a large breast prompt that's hidden in the seed even though you may have removed it from the prompt areas. Unfortunately there's no way to change or see what's in the seed itself

@sythra hi i need help can i get its documentation or code or how i can customize it example changing inference steps also it didnot generate NSFW when i try to do just shows black screen

@yasir black screen is a compatibility or set up issue. You referring to the model or one of my generations and how it's used in WebUi? I can show you my prompts and setting parameters etc but I don't really do NSFW so I'm not sure about how it does that it seemed to do plenty sexy for me but I've never asked it to do nudity so I wouldn't know.

@sythra thanks for replying i am using this model in huggingface space through gradio UI. if you have time can you provide the code

@sythrayou check the UI here https://mygyasir-stable-diffusion-fast.hf.space

Petite sometimes works. Small breasts without brackets sometimes works. It always wants to make them (small breasts) large!

In negative prompt: "huge boobs, huge tits, huge breasts, large boobs, large tits, large breasts, busty, buxom, c-cup, d-cup, e-cup, f-cup, g-cup, h-cup"

"large breasts" in the negative prompt usually works for me. Lots of checkpoints out there seem to love 'em large.

@Badjak I've been using "flat chest" and that seems to get it done! Thank you!

(flat_chest:1.4)

Might be a memory issue, not all of the models you use fit into your VRAM, something stays in your PCs RAM.

Technically yes, I think. However, if you want to publish said game, be warned that Steam doesn't allow any AI generated content in games.

@SC13NC3F1CT10N Thanks for the info!

Between this and photon nothing compares.

If you click that hash, you can see the model has several ones. And AUTOV2 is one of them. So depending on what's being used to create the hash, the first part of that string is the name of that hashing tool.

You are right

Dreamshaper is what i always recommend people learn stable diffusion on its pretty forgiving , works well with most loras and is overall just enjoyable to use.

thanks to your comment I realized there was a seperate model for inpainting.

You might want to define 'ethically', since that's a very relative term:)

I've been assured that no animals were injured in the training of this model. I'm not sure about artists, but here in America we consider them nuisance mammals anyway.

It's OK for Vegans